Articles

Framework on robotic percussive riveting for aircraft assembly automation

  • Feng-Feng Xi ,
  • Lin Yu ,
  • Xiao-Wei Tu
Expand
  • 1.Department of Aerospace Engineering, Ryerson University,Toronto, ON, Canada
    2.Robotic and Automation Center, Shanghai University,Shanghai 200072, People’s Republic of China
    3.Department of Automation and Instruments, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200072, People’s Republic of China
e-mail: fengxi@ryerson.ca

Received date: 2013-01-15

  Revised date: 2013-03-10

  Online published: 2013-04-23

Abstract

Presented in this paper is a framework for the implementation of a robotic percussive riveting system, a new robot application for aircraft assembly. It is shown here that a successful robot application to the automation of a process requires in-depth research of the process and the interaction with the robot. For this purpose, a process planning-driven approach is proposed to guide a robot application research.Atypical process planning will involve a list of
key considerations including: process sequence, process parameters, process tooling, and process control. Through this list, a number of key research issues are identified for robotic percussive riveting, such as rivet pattern planning,rivet time determination, rivet tooling design and rivet insertion control. The detailed research on these issues has effectively created know-how for the successful implementation of our robotic percussive riveting system.

Cite this article

Feng-Feng Xi , Lin Yu , Xiao-Wei Tu . Framework on robotic percussive riveting for aircraft assembly automation[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2013 , 1(1) : 112 -122 . DOI: 10.1007/s40436-013-0014-5

References

1. Campbell FC (2006)  Manufacturing technology for  aerospace structural materials. Elsevier,Amsterdam.pp 495-537

2. Mortimer J (2001) Jaguar uses X350 car  to pioneer us of self-piercing rivets. Indus Robot 28(3):192-198

3. Morey B (2007) Robot seeks its role in aerospace. Manuf Eng 139(4):AAC1-AAC6

4. Inman J,Carbrey B,Calawa R et al (1996) Flexible development system for automated aircraft assembly. SAE  aerospace automated  fastening conferenc  and exposition.October   1996. Bellevue,WA

5. Kleebaur  R (2006) Where precision counts above all else. The High Flyer 2:12-14

6. Monsarrat B,Lavoie E,Cote G et al (2007) High performance robotized assembly system for challenger 300 business jet nose fuse panels,AeroTech 2007. Los Angeles,CA

7. Kim SJ,Paik SH,Ji KH et al (2007) 3D riveting process simulation of  laminated  composites.  Key  Eng Mater  334-335:405-408

8. Groover  MP  (2004)  Fundamentals  of  modem  manufacturing materials,processes and systems,2nd edn. Wiley NewYork

9. Skorupa MKorbe1 A (2008) Modeling of the secondary bending in  riveted  joints  with  eccen   cities.  Arch  Mech  Eng  IV(4):369-387

10. AC 43.13-1B (1998) Acceptab1 me  odstechruesd  prac­ices-aircraft inspection and rep  .Federa1 Aviation Adrninis­ tration of USAissued on Sept 81998

11. Bhandari  LB  (2006)  Introduction  to  machine  d sign.  Tata McGraw-HillNew York

12. Yoon THKim SJ (2011) Refined numerica1 sirnu1ation of three­ dirnensiona1 riveting in 1arninated composites. AIAAA J Aircraf 48(4):1434-1443

13. Li Yxi  FBehdinan  K (2010)  Modeling and  simu1ation of P rcussive  riveting  for  robotic  automation. ASME  J  Comput Nonlinear Dyn  n 5(2):021011

14. Jeins H (2005) Design of robotic end effectors. In:Kurfess TR (ed) Robotics and automation handbook.CRC PressBoca Raton

15. Li Yxi FMoh       ned R et a1 (2011) Dynarnic ana1ysis for robotic integration  of  tooling systems. ASME J  D    am Syst Measur Con  01 133(4):041002

16. Lin YTu Xxi F et a1 (2013) Robust pose estimation with an outlier diagnosis based on a re1axation of rigid body constraints.ASME J Dynam Syst Measur Control.doi:10.1115/1.4006624

17. Janabi-Sh  ifi FM       y M (2010) A Kalman-Fi1ter-based me   od for pose estimation in visua1 servoing. IEEE Trans Robot 26(5):939-947
Outlines

/