Virtual simulation of production line for ergonomics evaluation

  • Ming Chen Jin-Fei Liu
Expand
  • 1. Sino-German College of Applied Sciences, Tongji University,
    Shanghai 201804, People’s Republic of China
    2. School of Electronics and Information Engineering, Tongji
    University, Shanghai 201804, People’s Republic of China

Received date: 2013-12-30

  Online published: 2014-01-27

Abstract

To avoid ergonomic problems in the early planning stages of a production line and achieve more satisfactory planning and design, ergonomic simulation is
particularly important in digital production line planning. An ergonomics analysis method is presented by using two theories: Ovako working posture analysis system (OWAS) and Burandt-Schultetus hand-arm force analysis (BSHA). The processes of ergonomics analysis and simulation are discussed based on a platform of process simulation and process designer. As an example, the paper shows how ergonomics problems are considered in production line planning to make a better choice between different production line planning schemes.

Cite this article

Ming Chen Jin-Fei Liu . Virtual simulation of production line for ergonomics evaluation[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2014 , 2(1) : 48 -53 . DOI: 10.1007/s40436-014-0060-7

References

1. Yang M, Yi MD (2009) Ergonomics simulation and application

in virtual assembly based on DELMIA. Agric Dev Equip 7:12–16

2. Qin CJ, Zhu GT (2000) Digital humans and internet collaboration

in digital manufacturing. J Syst Simul 12:204–207

3. Shi TY, Zhang H, Zhu ZH (2005) Study on the application of

ergonomics in the digitalized factory. Modul Mach Tool Autom

Manuf Tech 9:18–20

4. Ma¨a¨tta¨ T (2007) Human virtual environments in machinery safety

analysis and participatory ergonomics. Hum Factors Ergon

Manuf 17(5):435–443

5. Rivilis I, van Eerd D, Cullen K et al (2008) Effectiveness of

participatory ergonomic interventions on health outcomes. Appl

Ergon 39(3):342–358

6. Vink P, Peeters M, Grundemann RWM et al (1995) A participatory

ergonomics approach to reduce mental and physical

workload. Int J Ind Ergon 15(5):389–396

7. Vink P, Koningsveld EA, Molenbroek JF (2006) Positive outcomes

of participatory ergonomics in terms of greater comfort

and higher productivity. Appl Ergon 37(4):537–546

8. Laitila L (2005) Datormanikinprogram om verktyg vid arbetsplatsutformning.

En kritisk studie av programanva¨ndning. Thesis,

Lulea° Technical University, Lulea

9. Westgaard RH, Vinkel J (1997) Ergonomic intervention research

for improved musculoskeletal health: a critical review. Int J Ind

Ergon 20(6):463–500
10. Kuorinka I, Forcier L (1995) Work related musculoskeletal disordes

(WMSDs): a reference book for prevention. Taylor and

Francis, London

11. Wilson JR (1995) Solution ownership in a participative work

redesign: the case of a crane control room. Int J Ind Ergon

15(5):329–344

12. Waters TR, Putz-Anderson V, Garg A et al (1993) Revised NIOSH

equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting

tasks. Ergonomics 36(7):749–776

13. Falck AC (2007) Virtual and physical methods for efficient

ergonomics risk assessments:a development process for application

in car manufacturing. Chalmers University of Technology,

Go¨teborg

14. Bisantz AM, Roth E, Brickman B et al (2003) Integrating cognitive

analyses in a large-scale system design process. Int J Hum

Comput Stud 58(2):177–206

15. Munck-Ulfsfa´lt U, Falck A, Forsberg A et al (2003) Corporate

ergonomics programme at Volvo Car Corporation. Applied

Ergonomics 34:17–22

16. Broberg O (2007) Integrating ergonomics into engineering:

empirical evidence and implications for the ergonomists. Human

Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing 17(4):353–366

17. Laine E, Malm T, Latokartano J (2007) Human and industrial

robot cooperation: technologies and practical examples. In: Proceedings

of the 5th international conference safety of industrial

automated systems, pp 397–402, Tokyo, Japan

18. Hackos JT, Redish JC (1998) User and task analysis for interface

design. Wiley, New York

19. Stanton N (2006) Hierarchical task analysis: developments,

applications, and extensions. Applied Ergonomics 37(l):55–79

20. Vicente KJ (1999) Cognitive work analysis toward safe, productive,

and healthy computer-based work. Lawrence Erlbaum,

Mahwah

21. Beyer H, Holtzblatt K (1999) Contextual design. Interactions

6:32–42

22. Nielsen J (1993) Usability engineering. Academic Press, Boston

23. Karhu O, Kansi P, Kuorinka I (1977) Correcting working postures

in industry: a practical method for analysis. Applied Ergonomics

8(4):199–201

24. Muller MJ, Kuhn S (1993) Participatory design. Commun ACM

36:24–28

25. Chen M, Chen LP (2001) Ergonomics-based human modeling

and motion simulation. Mech Sci Technol 20:597–602

26. Luo SJ, Sun SQ, Tang MX et al (2005) Study on computer-aided

ergonomics design. J Zhejiang Univ Eng Sci 39(6):805–809
Outlines

/