Experimental measurement of acoustically induced surface vibration with different soil conditions

  • Zi-Yang Song ,
  • Yan-Li Zhang ,
  • Chi Wang ,
  • Wen-Wen Xu ,
  • Wei Ding
Expand
  • 1. Department of Precision Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200072, People's Republic of China;
    2. North Automatic Control Technology Research Institute, Taiyuan 030006, People's Republic of China;
    3. Science and Technology on Near-Surface Detection Laboratory, Wuxi 214035, People's Republic of China;
    4. Shanghai Public Utility School, Shanghai, People's Republic of China

Received date: 2015-07-16

  Revised date: 2016-08-04

  Online published: 2016-09-25

Abstract

Experimental measurement is performed to investigate the acoustically induced surface vibration with different soil conditions. Using the method of scanning detection and analyzing the three-dimensional (3D) characteristic diagram of surface vibration, the influence of soil properties, such as porosity and humidity, upon the signal of acoustically induced surface vibration is measured. The experimental results show that the surface vibration reduces with the decrease of soil porosity and reduces a little with the increase of soil humidity; and with a big plastic landmine buried, the surface vibration enhances significantly. It indicates that the signal of acoustically induced surface vibration mainly depends on soil porosity and mechanical effect of buried objects.

Cite this article

Zi-Yang Song , Yan-Li Zhang , Chi Wang , Wen-Wen Xu , Wei Ding . Experimental measurement of acoustically induced surface vibration with different soil conditions[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2016 , 4(3) : 278 -285 . DOI: 10.1007/s40436-016-0153-6

References

1. Bass HE, Bolen LN (1980) Coupling of airborne sound into the earth frequency dependence. J Acoust Soc Am 67:1502-1506
2. Sabatier JM, Bass HE, Bolen LN et al (1986) The interaction of airborne sound with the porous ground:The theoretical formulation. J Acoust Soc Am 79:1345-1352
3. Sabatier JM, Bass HE, Bolen LN et al (1986) Acoustically induced seismic waves. J Acoust Soc Am 80:646-649
4. Hickey CJ, Sabatier JM (1997) Measurements of two types of dilatational waves in an air-filled unconsolidated sand. J Acoust Soc Am 102(1):128-136
5. Sabatier JM, Xiang N (2001) An investigation of acoustic-toseismic coupling to detect buried antitank landmines. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 39(6):1146-1154
6. Xiang N, Sabatier JM (2003) An experimental study on antipersonnel landmine detection using acoustic-to-seismic coupling. J Acoust Soc Am 113(3):1333-1341
7. Biot MA (1956) Theory of propagation of elastic waves in a fluidsaturated porous solid I:low-frequency range. J Acoust Soc Am 28(2):168-178
8. Biot MA (1956) Theory of propagation of elastic waves in a fluidsaturated porous solid Ⅱ:higher frequency range. J Acoust Soc Am 28(2):179-191
9. Dvorkin J, Nur A (1993) Dynamic poroelastic:a unified model with the squirt and the Biot mechanisms. Geophysics 58(4):524-533
10. Stern M, Bedford A, Millwater HR (1985) Wave reflection from a sediment layer with depth-dependent properties. J Acoust Soc Am 77(5):1781-1788
11. Berryman JG (1981) Elastic wave propagation in fluid-saturated porous media. J Acoust Soc Am 69(2):416-424
12. Denneman AIM, Drijkoningen GG, Smeulders DMJ et al (2002) Special section-seismic signatures of fluid transport dynamic effects of fluid:theory and modeling. Geophysics 67(1):282-291
13. Mochizuki S (1982) Attenuation in partially saturated rocks. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 87(B10):8598-8604
14. Santos JE, Douglas J, Corberó J et al (1990) A model for wave propagation in porous medium saturated by a two-phase fluid. J Acoust Soc Am 87(4):1439-1448
15. Beresnev IA (2013) Seismic study of the low-permeability volume in southern France karst systems. Geophysics 79(1):1-13
16. Cai YQ, Li BZ, Xu CJ (2006) Analysis of elastic wave propagation in sand stone saturated by two immiscible fluids. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 25(10):2009-2016
17. Ding W, Wu WW, Wang C et al (2014) Propagation characteristics of seismic waves in shallow soil with the unsaturated threephase poroelastic model. Acta Phys Sin 63(22):224301
18. Robert WH, Kenneth DR (2005) Standoff acoustic laser technique to locate buried landmines. Linc Lab J 15(1):3-22
19. Wang C, Li XF, Yu YJ et al (2010) Analysis of soil-landmine resonance model. Acta Phys Sin 59(9):6319-6325
20. Wang C, Zhou YQ, Shen GW et al (2013) Numerical analysis of the resonance mechanisms of the lumped parameter system model for acoustic landmines detection. Chin Phys B 22(12):124601
21. Wang C, Zhou YQ, Shen GW et al (2013) Impact of buried objects on acoustic-to-seismic coupling efficiency. J Tianjin Univ 46(6):498-502
22. Ding W, Shen GW, Wang C et al (2014) Acoustic-to-seismic coupling based discrimination for non-metallic mine detection. Optics Precis Eng 22(5):1331-1338
23. Chen C, Liu D, Zhang HR et al (2015) Application of equivalent circuit analysis method in investigation of acoustic resonance mines detection model. J Electron Meas Instrum 29(6):874-879
24. Wang C, Xu LL, Zhu J et al (2016) A novel integrated fiber-optic interferometer model and its application in micro-displacement measurement. Opt Lasers Eng 86:125-131
25. Ding H, Huang LL, Mao XY et al (2016) Primary resonance of traveling viscoelastic beam under internal resonance. Appl Math Mech (Engl Ed). doi:10.1007/s10483-016-2152-6

Outlines

/