Particle fracture and debonding during orthogonal machining of metal matrix composites
Received date: 2016-07-19
Revised date: 2017-01-03
Online published: 2017-03-25
This paper investigates the particle fracture and debonding during machining of metal matrix composite (MMC) due to developed stress and strain, and interaction with moving tool by finite element analysis. The machining zone was divided into three regions:primary, secondary and tertiary deformation zones. The tendency of particles to fracture in each deformation zone was investigated. The findings of this study were also discussed with respect to the experimental results available in the literature. It was found that particles at the cutting path in the tertiary deformation zone fractured as it interacted with tool. In the secondary deformation zone, particles interacted with other particles as well as cutting tool. This caused debonding and fracture of huge number of particles as those were moving up along the rake face with the chips. No particle fracture was noted at the primary deformation zone. The results obtained from finite element analysis were very similar to those obtained from experimental studies.
A. Pramanik , L. C. Zhang . Particle fracture and debonding during orthogonal machining of metal matrix composites[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2017 , 5(1) : 77 -82 . DOI: 10.1007/s40436-017-0170-0
1. Pramanik A (2014) Developments in the non-traditional machining of particle reinforced metal matrix composites. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 86:44-61
2. Needleman A, Nuti SR, Suresh S et al (1993) Matrix, reinforcement, and interfacial failure. In:Davim JP (eds) Fundamentals of metal-matrix composites (A 95-25875 06-24). Butterworth-Heinemann, Stoneham, pp 233-250
3. Pramanik A, Arsecularatne J, Zhang L (2008) Machining of particulate-reinforced metal matrix composites. In:machining. Springer, London, pp 127-166
4. Clyne TW, Withers PJ (1993) Fracture process and failure mechanism. In:Davis EA, Ward IM (eds) An introduction to metal matrix composites. Press syndicate of the University of Cambridge, Cambridge
5. Pramanik A, Zhang L, Arsecularatne J (2007) An FEM investigation into the behavior of metal matrix composites:tool-particle interaction during orthogonal cutting. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47(10):1497-1506
6. Monaghan J, Brazil D (1997) Modeling the sub-surface damage associated with the machining of a particle reinforced MMC. Comput Mater Sci 9(1):99-107
7. Pramanik A, Zhang L, Arsecularatne J (2007) Micro-indentation of metal matrix composites-an FEM analysis. Key Eng Mater 340:341
8. Zhu Y, Kishawy H (2005) Influence of alumina particles on the mechanics of machining metal matrix composites. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45(4):389-398
9. Pramanik A, Zhang L, Arsecularatne J (2006) Prediction of cutting forces in machining of metal matrix composites. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46(14):1795-1803
10. Reddy PR, Sriramakrishna A (2002) Analysis of orthogonal cutting of aluminium-based composites. Def Sci J 52(4):375-383
11. ANSYS/LS-DYNA, ANSYS/LS-DYNA reference manual, Release 10, Livermore Software Technology Corporation, 7374 Las Positas Road, Livermore, CA 94551
12. Meijer G, Ellyin F, Xia Z (2000) Aspects of residual thermal stress/strain in particle reinforced metal matrix composites. Compos Part B Eng 31(1):29-37
13. Long S, Zhou Y (2005) Thermal fatigue of particle reinforced metal-matrix composite induced by laser heating and mechanical load. Compos Sci Technol 65(9):1391-1400
14. Nan CW, Clarke D (1996) The influence of particle size and particle fracture on the elastic/plastic deformation of metal matrix composites. Acta Mater 44(9):3801-3811
15. Quan Y, Zhou Z, Ye B (1999) Cutting process and chip appearance of aluminum matrix composites reinforced by SiC particle. J Mater Process Technol 91(1):231-235
16. Hung NP, Loh N, Venkatesh V (1999) Machining of metal matrix composites. In:Jahanmir S, Ramulu M, Koshy P (eds) Machining of ceramics and composites. Marcel Dekker, New York
17. El-Gallab M, Sklad M (1998) Machining of Al/SiC particulate metal matrix composites:part II:workpiece surface integrity. J Mater Process Technol 83(1):277-285
18. El-Gallab M, Sklad M (1998) Machining of Al/SiC particulate metal-matrix composites:part I:tool performance. J Mater Process Technol 83(1):151-158
19. Ding X, Liew W, Liu X (2005) Evaluation of machining performance of MMC with PCBN and PCD tools. Wear 259(7):1225-1234
20. Heath PJ (2001) Developments in applications of PCD tooling. J Mater Process Technol 116(1):31-38
21. Chambers A (1996) The machinability of light alloy MMCs. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 27(2):143-147
22. Jaspers S, Dautzenberg J (2002) Material behaviour in metal cutting:strains, strain rates and temperatures in chip formation. J Mater Process Technol 121(1):123-135
23. Lin CB, Hung YW, Liu WC et al (2001) Machining and fluidity of 356Al/SiC(p) composites. J Mater Process Technol 110(2):152-159
24. Davim JP (2002) Diamond tool performance in machining metal-matrix composites. J Mater Process Technol 128(1):100-105
25. K?l?çkap E, Ç ak?r O, Aksoy M et al (2005) Study of tool wear and surface roughness in machining of homogenised SiC-p reinforced aluminium metal matrix composite. J Mater Process Technol 164:862-867
26. Ciftci I, Turker M, Seker U (2004) Evaluation of tool wear when machining SiC p-reinforced Al-2014 alloy matrix composites. Mater Des 25(3):251-255
27. Zhang Z, Zhang L, Mai YW (1995) Particle effects on friction and wear of aluminium matrix composites. J Mater Sci 30(23):5999-6004
28. Yan C, Zhang L (1994) Single-point scratching of 6061 Al alloy reinforced by different ceramic particles. Appl Compos Mater 1(6):431-447
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
