Additive manufacturing of mechanical testing samples based on virgin poly (lactic acid) (PLA) and PLA/wood fibre composites
Received date: 2017-05-04
Revised date: 2018-01-08
Online published: 2018-03-25
3D printing in additive manufacturing is considered as one of key technologies to the future high-precision manufacturing in order to benefit diverse industries in building construction, product development, biomedical innovation, etc. The increasing applications of 3D printed components depend primarily on their significant merits of reduced weight, minimum used materials, high precision and shorter production time. Furthermore, it is very crucial that such 3D printed components can maintain the same or even better material performance and product quality as those achieved by conventional manufacturing methods. This study successfully fabricated 3D printed mechanical testing samples of PLA and PLA/wood fibre composites. 3D printing parameters including infill density, layer height and the number of shells were investigated via design of experiments (DoE), among which the number of shells was determined as the most significant factor for maximising tensile strengths of PLA samples. Further, DoE work evaluated the effect of material type (i.e., neat PLA and PLA/wood fibres) and the number of shells on tensile, flexural and impact strengths of material samples. It is suggested that material type is the only predominant factor for maximising all mechanical strengths, which however are consistently lower for PLA/wood fibre composites when compared with those of neat PLA. Increasing the number of shells, on the other hand, has been found to improve almost all strength levels and decrease infill cavities.
The full text can be downloaded at https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40436-018-0211-3
Yu Dong , Jamie Milentis , Alokesh Pramanik . Additive manufacturing of mechanical testing samples based on virgin poly (lactic acid) (PLA) and PLA/wood fibre composites[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2018 , 6(1) : 71 -82 . DOI: 10.1007/s40436-018-0211-3
1. Chen D, Heyer S, Ibbotson S et al (2015) Direct digital manufacturing:definition, evolution, and sustainability implications. J Clean Prod 107:615-625
2. Murphy SV, Atala A (2014) 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat Biotechnol 32:773-785
3. Gao W, Zhang Y, Ramanujan D et al (2015) The status, challenges, and future of additive manufacturing in engineering. Comput-Aided Des 69:65-89
4. Li X, Cui R, Sun L et al (2014) 3D-printed biopolymers for tissue engineering application. Int J Polym Sci 24:1-13
5. Patricio T, Domingos M, Gloria A et al (2013) Characterisation of PCL and PCL/PLA scaffolds for tissue engineering. Procedia CIRP 5:110-114
6. Senatov FS, Niaza KV, Zadorozhnyy MY et al (2016) Mechanical properties and shape memory effect of 3D-printed PLAbased Porous scaffolds. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 57:139-148
7. Rosenzweig DH, Carelli E, Steffen T et al (2015) 3D-printed ABS and PLA scaffolds for cartilage and mucleus pulposus tissue regeneration. Int J Mol Sci 16:15118-15135
8. Inzana JA, Olvera D, Fuller SM et al (2014) 3D printing of composite calcium phosphate and collagen scaffolds for bone regeneration. Biomaterials 35:4026-4034
9. Bakarich SE, Gorkin IR, Panhuis MIH et al (2014) Three-dimensional printing fiber reinforced hydrogel composites. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:15998-16006
10. Le Duigou A, Castro M, Bevan R et al (2016) 3D printing of wood fibre biocomposites:from mechanical to actuation functionality. Mater Des 96:106-114
11. Suwanprateeb J, Sanngam R, Suvannapruk W et al (2009) Mechanical and in vitro performance of apatite-wollastonite glass ceramic reinforced hydroxyapatite composite fabricated by 3Dprinting. J Mater Sci-Mater Med 20:1281-1289
12. Compton BG, Lewis JA (2014) 3D-printing of lightweight cellular composites. Adv Mater 26:5930-5935
13. Richter C, Lipson H (2011) Untethered hovering flapping flight of a 3D-printed mechanical insect. Artif Life 17:73-86
14. Park SH (1996) Robust design and analysis for quality engineering. Chapman & Hall, London
15. Dong Y, Bhattacharyya D (2008) Effect of clay type, clay/compatibiliser content and matrix viscosity on the mechanical properties of polypropylene/organoclay nanocomposites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 39:1177-1191
16. Dong Y, Bickford T, Haroosh HJ et al (2013) Multi-response analysis in the material characterisation of electrospun poly (lactic acid)/halloysite nanotube composite fibres based on Taguchi design of experiments:fibre diameter, non-intercalation and nucleation effects. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process 112:747-757
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
