ARTICLES

Tillage force and disturbance characteristics of different geometric-shaped subsoilers via DEM

  • Jin Tong ,
  • Xiao-Hu Jiang ,
  • Yue-Ming Wang ,
  • Yun-Hai Ma ,
  • Jun-Wei Li ,
  • Ji-Yu Sun
Expand
  • 1 Key Laboratory of Bionic Engineering, Ministry of Education, Jilin University, Changchun 130022, People's Republic of China;
    2 College of Biology and Agricultural Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130022, People's Republic of China;
    3 College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, Xinjiang, People's Republic of China

Received date: 2019-11-25

  Revised date: 2020-04-06

  Online published: 2020-09-10

Supported by

This study was financially supported by the National Key R & D Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFD0701103), the EU H2020 Program (FabSurfWAR No. 644971), the 111 Project (Grant No. B16020) of China, the National Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. 51805338), and the China Scholarship Council, China (CSC).We are sincerely grateful to Prof. Jianqun Yu for providing us support for the EDEM software. Furthermore, we are grateful to the editors for immediate processing of the manuscript and to the anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions.

Abstract

With the increased use of agricultural machinery in field operations, soil compaction has become increasingly severe, and the plough pan has become deeper. Subsoiling is an excellent way to address this problem. However, it is limited by high energy consumption, which is closely related to tillage force. To investigate the effect of the geometric shape of shanks and tines on tillage force and soil disturbance in loam, a layered soil model in accordance with the actual conditions was established and five different subsoilers were simulated via discrete element modeling. The results indicated that the shank impacted soil disturbance and tine impacted tillage force. The draft force of curved shank and chisel tine was 8% less than that of the straight shank and sweep tine. The straight shank and sweep tine produced a larger furrow profile and a higher furrow width. The subsoiler with curved shank and chisel tine (C-C) exhibited the lowest specific resistance (12.87, 17.52, 19.46 and 21.18 kN/m2 in the 30, 35, 40 and 45 cm tillage depth, respectively) considering the draft force and soil disturbance characteristics. Hence, these results will facilitate in the selection of a suitable subsoiler and design of new subsoilers with lower energy consumption requirements for loam areas worldwide.

The full text can be downloaded at https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40436-020-00318-x

Cite this article

Jin Tong , Xiao-Hu Jiang , Yue-Ming Wang , Yun-Hai Ma , Jun-Wei Li , Ji-Yu Sun . Tillage force and disturbance characteristics of different geometric-shaped subsoilers via DEM[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2020 , 8(3) : 392 -404 . DOI: 10.1007/s40436-020-00318-x

References

1. Bidare P, Bitharas I, Ward RM et al (2018) Laser powder bed fusion at sub-atmospheric pressures. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 130/131:65-72
2. Criales LE, Arısoy YM, Lane B et al (2017) Laser powder bed fusion of nickel alloy 625:experimental investigations of effects of process parameters on melt pool size and shape with spatter analysis. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 121:22-36
3. Josupeit S, Ordia L, Schmid H (2016) Modelling of temperatures and heat flow within laser sintered part cakes. Addit Manuf 12:189-196
4. Ganci M, Zhu W, Buffa G et al (2017) A macroscale FEM-based approach for selective laser sintering of thermoplastics. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91:3169-3180
5. Setti GDO, Lopes Da Silva JV, De Oliveira MF et al (2014) Surface methods for monitoring the densification of parts in the selective laser sintering process. Rapid Prototyp J 20:157-163
6. Bai J, Zhang B, Song J et al (2016) The effect of processing conditions on the mechanical properties of polyethylene produced by selective laser sintering. Polym Test 52:89-93
7. Song JL, Li YT, Deng QL et al (2007) Rapid prototyping manufacturing of silica sand patterns based on selective laser sintering. J Mater Process Technol 187/188:614-618
8. Brajlih T, Paulic M, Irgolic T et al (2016) Study of the complementary usages of selective laser sintering during the high volume production of plastic parts. Rapid Prototyp J 22:735-742
9. Van Hooreweder B, Kruth J (2014) High cycle fatigue properties of selective laser sintered parts in polyamide 12. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 63:241-244
10. Xing J, Sun W, Rana RS (2013) 3D modeling and testing of transient temperature in selective laser sintering (SLS) process. Optik 124:301-304
11. Wegner A, Witt G (2011) Process monitoring in laser sintering using thermal imaging. In:The 22nd annual international solid freedom fabrication symposium-an additive manufacturing conference, Austin, TX
12. Wegner A, Witt G (2015) Understanding the decisive thermal processes in laser sintering of polyamide 12. In:Proceedings of the polymer processing society 30th annual meeting, Cleveland, Ohio. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4918511
13. Wroe WW, Gladstone J, Phillips T et al (2016) In-situ thermal image correlation with mechanical properties of nylon-12 in SLS. Rapid Prototyp J 22(5):794-800
14. Abdelrahman M, Starr TL (2016) Quality certification and control of polymer laser sintering:layerwise temperature monitoring using thermal imaging. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 84:831-842
15. Zeng K, Pal D, Stucker B (2012) A review of thermal analysis methods in laser sintering and selective laser melting. In:The 23rd annual international solid freeform fabrication symposium-an additive manufacturing conference, Austin, TX, pp 796-814
16. Kim H, Lin Y, Tseng TB (2018) A review on quality control in additive manufacturing. Rapid Prototyp J 24:645-669
Options
Outlines

/