Layout design of a mixed-flow production line based on processing energy consumption and buffer configuration

  • Cai-Xia Zhang ,
  • Shu-Lin Dong ,
  • Hong-Yan Chu ,
  • Guo-Zhi Ding ,
  • Zhi-Feng Liu ,
  • Shi-Yao Guo ,
  • Chong-Bin Yang
Expand
  • 1 Institute of Advanced Manufacturing and Intelligent Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, People's Republic of China;
    2 Beijing Key Laboratory of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, People's Republic of China;
    3 Beijing Xinghang Electromechanical Equipment Co., Ltd., Beijing 100074, People's Republic of China;
    4 School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, People's Republic of China

Received date: 2020-11-16

  Revised date: 2021-01-19

  Online published: 2021-09-13

Supported by

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the National Science and Technology Major Project of China (Grant No. 2019ZX04024001), the Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality (Grant No.3192003), the General Project of Science and Technology Plan from Beijing Educational Committee (Grant No. KM201810005013), the Tribology Science Fund of State Key Laboratory of Tribology (Grant Nos.STLEKF16A02, SKLTKF19B08), and the Training Program of Rixin Talent and Outstanding Talent from Beijing University of Technology.

Abstract

Green manufacturing is a growing trend, and an effective layout design method for production lines can reduce resource wastage in processing. This study focuses on existing problems such as low equipment utilization, long standby time, and low logistics efficiency in a mixed-flow parallel production line. To reduce the energy consumption, a novel method considering an independent buffer configuration and idle energy consumption analysis is proposed for this production line's layout design. A logistics intensity model and a machine tool availability model are established to investigate the influences of independent buffer area configuration on the logistics intensity and machine tool availability. To solve the coupling problem between machine tools in such production lines, a decoupling strategy for the relationship between machine tool processing rates is explored. An energy consumption model for the machine tools, based on an optimized configuration of independent buffers, is proposed. This model can effectively reduce the idle energy consumption of the machine tools while designing the workshop layout. Subsequently, considering the problems encountered in workshop production, a comprehensive optimization model for the mixed-flow production line is developed. To verify the effectiveness of the mathematical model, it is applied to an aviation cabin production line. The results indicate that it can effectively solve the layout problem of mixed-flow parallel production lines and reduce the idle energy consumption of machine tools during production. The proposed buffer configuration and layout design method can serve as a theoretical and practical reference for the layout design of mixed-flow parallel production lines. 

The full text can be downloaded at https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs40436-021-00354-1

Cite this article

Cai-Xia Zhang , Shu-Lin Dong , Hong-Yan Chu , Guo-Zhi Ding , Zhi-Feng Liu , Shi-Yao Guo , Chong-Bin Yang . Layout design of a mixed-flow production line based on processing energy consumption and buffer configuration[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2021 , 9(3) : 369 -387 . DOI: 10.1007/s40436-021-00354-1

References

1. Cao HJ, Li HC (2020) The state-of-art and future development strategies of green manufacturing. China Mech Eng 31(2):135-144
2. Duflou JR, Sutherland JW, Dornfeld D et al (2012) Towards energy and resource efficient manufacturing:a processes and systems approach. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 61(2):587-609
3. Hyunjei J, Sang DN, Cho YJ (2014) An agile operations management system for green factory. Int J Precis Eng and Manuf Green Technol 1:131-143
4. Ficko M, Palcic I (2013) Designing a layout using the modified triangle method, and genetic algorithms. Int J Simul Model 12(4):237-251
5. Ripon KSN, Glette K, Khan KN et al (2013) Adaptive variable neighborhood search for solving multiobjective facility layout problems with unequal area facilities. Swarm Evol Comput 8:1-12
6. Giuseppe A, Giada L, Mario E (2012) A multi objective genetic algorithm for the facility layout problem based upon slicing structure encoding. Expert Syst Appl 39:10352-10358
7. Jeong KC, Kim YD (2000) Heuristics for selecting machines and determining buffer capacities in assembly systems. Cumput Ind Eng 38:341-360
8. Zhou J, Liu ZQ (2006) Relationship between machine utilization and buffer capacity. Tool Eng 40(9):24-26
9. Sahni S, Gonzalez T (1976) P-complete approximation problems. J Assoc Comput Mach 23(3):555-565
10. Liggett RS (2000) Automated facilities layout:past, present and future. Autom Constr 9(2):197-215
11. Drira A, Pierreval H, Hajri-Gabouj S (2007) Facility layout problems:a survey. Ann Rev Control 31(2):255-267
12. Kundu A, Dan PK (2012) Metaheuristic in facility layout problems:current trend and future direction. Int J Ind Syst Eng 10(2):238-253
13. Tarigan U, Ambarita MB (2018) Production layout improvement by using line balancing and systematic layout planning (SLP) at PT.XYZ. Mater Sci Eng 309(1):012116
14. Garcia-Hernandez L, Pierreval H, Salas-Morera L et al (2013) Handling qualitative aspects in unequal area facility layout problem:an interactive genetic algorithm. Appl Soft Comput J 13(4):1718-1727
15. Jerzy G, Rafal M (2017) A novel version of simulated annealing based on linguistic patterns for solving facility layout problems. Knowl-Based Syst 124:55-69
16. Yang TH, Peters BA, Tu MG (2005) Layout design for flexible manufacturing systems considering single-loop directional flow patterns. Eur J Oper Res 164(2):440-455
17. Jaramillo JR (2007) The generalized machine layout problem. Dissertation, West Virgina University, Morgantown
18. Chen XF, Lu JS, Li YD et al (2010) Simulation decision-making study of buffer area allocation in workshop layout of a discrete manufacturing enterprise. J Zhejiang Univ Technol 38(3):246-250, 256
19. Chirici L, Wang KS (2014) Tackling the storage problem through genetic algorithms. Adv Manuf 2(3):203-211
20. Yang WQ, Deng L, Niu Q et al (2013) Warehouse scheduling performance analysis considering LHRL. Adv Manuf 1(2):136-142
21. Bulgak AA (2011) Analysis and design of split and merge unpaced assembly systems by metamodelling and stochastic search. Int J Prod Res 44(18):4067-4080
22. Ding GT, Tu FS (1999) Analysis of variance of output and state of a serial production line with different allocation of buffer capacities. J Nankai Univ 32(4):107-114
23. Tan B (2001) A three-station merge system with unreliable stations and a shared buffer. Math and Comput Model 33(8):1011-1026
24. Diamantidis AC (2006) Markovian analysis of a discrete material manufacturing system with merge operation, operation-dependent and idleness failures. Comput Ind Eng 50(4):466-487
25. Meng FL, Tan DL, Huang XM (2005) Research on buffer capacity in assembly system. Comput Intergr Manuf Syst 11(11):1609-1615
26. Song SG, Li AP (2008) Buffer capacity optimization in reconfigurable manufacturing system. Comput Intergr Manuf Syst 14(10):1951-1956
27. Malathrons JP, Perkins JD (1982) The availability of a system of two unreliable machines connected by an intermediate storage tank. AIIE Trans 15(3):195-201
28. Yeralan S, Feanck WE (1986) A continuous materials flow production line with station breakdown. Eur J Oper Res 27(3):289-300
29. Li AP, Yu HB (2016) Collaborative optimization method of buffer and facility layout in production lines based on NSGA-II algorithm. J Tongji Univ 44(12):1902-1909
30. Bennett DP (2004) A decomposition approach for an equipment selection and multiple product routing problem incorporating environmental factors. Eur J Oper Res 156(3):643-664
31. He Y, Li YF (2015) An energy-responsive optimization method for machine tool selection and operation sequence in flexible machining job shops. J Clean Prod 87(1):245-254
32. Liu X (2008) Hybrid flow-shop scheduling problem based on saving energy. In:Proceedings of the 27th Chinese control conference, 16-18 July 2008, Kunming, China
33. Guo SL, Zhou Y, Yang HD (2017) Minimizing energy consumption and tardiness penalty for fuzzy flow shop scheduling with state-dependent setup time. J Clean Prod 147:470-484
34. Fadi S, Joaquin OM (2014) Optimizing the production scheduling of a single machine to minimize total energy consumption costs. J Clean Prod 67:197-207
35. Kan F, Nelson U (2011) A new approach to scheduling in manufacturing for power consumption and carbon footprint reduction. J Manuf Syst 30:234-240
36. Wang W(2011) Research on energy consumption optimization oriented job shop scheduling methodology and development of its application environment. Dissertation, Harbin Inst Technol, Harbin
37. Liu ZF, Yan J, Cheng Q et al (2019) The mixed production mode considering continuous and intermittent processing for an energyefficient hybrid flow shop scheduling. J Clean Prod 246(2):119071
38. Liu N, Zhang YF, Lu WF (2019) Improving energy efficiency in discrete parts manufacturing system using an ultra-flexible job shop scheduling algorithm. Int J Precis Eng Manuf Green Technol 6:349-356
39. Liu Y, Dong HB, Lohse N (2014) An investigation into minimising total energy consumption and total weighted tardiness in job shops. J Clean Prod 65:87-95
40. Zhang L, Zhao XK, Ke QD (2021) Disassembly line balancing optimization method for high efficiency and low carbon emission. Int J Precis Eng Manuf Green Technol 8:233-247
41. Fang KT, Lin BMT (2013) Parallel-machine scheduling to minimize tardiness penalty and power cost. Cumput Ind Eng 64:224-234
42. Fahad M, Naqvi S, Atir M et al (2016) Energy management in a manufacturing industry through layout design. Proc Manuf 8:168-174
43. Yang L, Deuse J, Jiang P (2013) Multi-objective optimization of facility planning for energy intensive companies. J Intell Manuf 24:1095-1109
44. Yang L, Deuse J, Jiang P (2013) Multiple-attribute decisionmaking approach for an energy-efficient facility layout design. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 66:795-807
45. Srinivas C, Satyanaraynab R (2011) Determination of buffer size in single and multi row flexible manufacturing systems through simulation. Int J Eng Sci Technol 3(5):1729-1733
46. Marek K, Radko P (2014) Analysis of the production process in the selected company and proposal a possible model optimization through PLM software module tecnomatix plant simulation. Proc Manuf 96:221-226
47. Chen M, Liu JF (2014) Virtual simulation of production line for ergonomics evaluation. Adv Manuf 2(1):48-53
48. Tang XY, Shi J, Chen LC et al (2013) Logistics simulation and optimization design of one production line based on Flexsim. Appl Mech Mater 397/400:2622-2625
49. Ren CL, Yang XD, Zhang CY et al (2019) Modeling and optimization for energy-efficient hybrid flow-shop scheduling problem. Comput Integr Manuf Syst 25(8):1965-1980
Outlines

/