An experimental analysis regarding the distribution of the cutting fluid is very difficult due to the inaccessibility of the contact zone within the bore hole. Therefore, suitable simulation models are necessary to evaluate new tool designs and optimize drilling processes. In this paper the coolant distribution during helical deep hole drilling is analyzed with high-speed microscopy. Micro particles are added to the cutting fluid circuit by a developed high-pressure mixing vessel. After the evaluation of suitable particle size, particle concentration and coolant pressure, a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation is validated with the experimental results. The comparison shows a very good model quality with a marginal difference for the flow velocity of 1.57% between simulation and experiment. The simulation considers the kinematic viscosity of the fluid. The results show that the fluid velocity in the chip flutes is low compared to the fluid velocity at the exit of the coolant channels of the tool and drops even further between the guide chamfers. The flow velocity and the flow pressure directly at the cutting edge decrease to such an extent that the fluid cannot generate a sufficient cooling or lubrication. With the CFD simulation a deeper understanding of the behavior and interactions of the cutting fluid is achieved. Based on these results further research activities to improve the coolant supply can be carried out with great potential to evaluate new tool geometries and optimize the machining process.
The full text can be downloaded at https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40436-021-00383-w
Ekrem Oezkaya
,
Sebastian Michel
,
Dirk Biermann
. Experimental and computational analysis of the coolant distribution considering the viscosity of the cutting fluid during machining with helical deep hole drills[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2022
, 10(2)
: 235
-249
.
DOI: 10.1007/s40436-021-00383-w
1. Aamir M, Giasin K, Tolouei-Rad M et al (2020) A review: drilling performance and hole quality of aluminium alloys for aerospace applications. J Mater Res Tech 9:12484–12500
2. Abele E, Fujara M (2010) Simulation-based twist drill design and geometry optimization. CIRP Ann-Manuf 59:145–150
3. Kyratsis P, Bilalis N, Antoniadis A (2011) CAD-based simulations and design of experiments for determining thrust force in drilling operations. Comput Aided Design 43:1879–1890
4. Luttervelt CA, Childs THC, Jawahir IS et al (1998) Present situation and future trends in modelling of machining operations progress report of the cirp working group ‘modelling of machining operations’. CIRP Ann-Manuf 47:587–626
5. Mackerle J (1999) Finite-element analysis and simulation of machining: a bibliography (1976–1996). J Mater Process Tech 86:17–44
6. Mackerle J (2003) Finite element analysis and simulation of machining: an addendum a bibliography (1996–2002). Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43:103–114
7. Arrazola PJ, Özel T, Umbrello D et al (2013) Recent advances in modelling of metal machining processes. CIRP Ann-Manuf 62:695–718
8. Aurich JC, Bil H (2006) 3D finite element modelling of segmented chip formation. CIRP Ann-Manuf 55:47–50
9. Heinemann R, Hinduja S, Barrow G et al (2006) The performance of small diameter twist drills in deep-hole drilling. J Manuf Sci Eng 128:884–892
10. Abukhshim NA, Mativenga PT, Sheikh MA (2006) Heat generation and temperature prediction in metal cutting: a review and implications for high speed machining. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46:782–800
11. Çakīr O, Yardimeden A, Ozben T et al (2007) Selection of cutting fluids in machining processes. J Achieve Mater Manuf Eng 25:99–102
12. Fallenstein F, Aurich JC (2014) CFD based investigation on internal cooling of twist drills. Proc CIRP 14:293–298
13. Bücker M, Oezkaya E, Hensler U et al (2020) A new flank face design leading to an improved process performance when drilling high-temperature nickel-base alloys. MIC Procedia. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3722782
14. Uçak N, Çiçek A (2018) The effects of cutting conditions on cutting temperature and hole quality in drilling of Inconel 718 using solid carbide drills. J Manuf Process 31:662–673
15. Verein DI (2014) VDI-Richtlinie 3210: Tiefbohrverfahren. Beuth Verlag, Berlin
16. Biermann D, Bleicher F, Heisel U et al (2018) Deep hole drilling. CIRP Ann-Manuf 67:673–694
17. Uhlmann E, Richarz S (2016) Twisted deep hole drilling tools for hard machining. J Manuf Processes 24:225–230
18. Khan SA, Nazir A, Mughal MP et al (2017) Deep hole drilling of AISI 1045 via high-speed steel twist drills: evaluation of tool wear and hole quality. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93:1115–1125
19. Volz M, Abele E, Weigold M (2020) Lateral vibrations in deep hole drilling due to land width variation. J Manuf Mater Process 28:1–14
20. Kirschner M, Michel S, Berger S et al (2017) Adaption of the tool design in micro deep hole drilling of difficult-to-cut materials by high-speed chip formation analyses. In: Schmitt R, Schuh G (eds) 7, Apprimus Verlag, WGP-Jahreskongress Aachen, pp 29–36
21. Fettig A (2021) Deep hole drilling demands precise coolant control. Manuf Eng 6:12–14
22. Mihail LA (2013) Robust engineering of deep drilling process by surface state optimization. Proc CIRP 8:582–587
23. Heinemann RK, Hinduja S (2009) Investigating the feasibility of DLC-coated twist drills in deep-hole drilling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 44:862–869
24. Oezkaya E, Michel S, Biermann D (2018) Experimental studies and FEM simulation of helical-shaped deep hole twist drills. Prod Eng Res Devel 12:11–23
25. Schnabel D, Oezkaya E, Biermann D et al (2017) Modeling the motion of the cooling lubricant in drilling processesusing the finite volume and the smoothed particle hydrodynamics methods. Comput Method Appl M 329:369–395
26. Biermann D, Iovkov I, Blum H et al (2012) Thermal aspects in deep hole drilling of aluminium cast alloy using twist drills and MQL. Proc CIRP 3:245–250
27. Wosniak FA, Polli ML, Camargo BPA (2016) Study on tool wear and chip shapes in deep drilling of AISI 4150 steel. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 38:473–480
28. Aized T, Amjad M (2013) Quality improvement of deep-hole drilling process of AISI D2. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69:2493–2503
29. Wegert R, Guski V, Möhring HC et al (2020) Temperature monitoring in the subsurface during single lip deep hole drilling. tm-Technisches Messen 87:757–767
30. Schmidt R, Strodick S, Walther F et al (2020) Analysis of the functional properties in the bore sub-surface zone during BTA deep-hole drilling. Proc CIRP 88:318–323
31. Beer N, Oezkaya E, Biermann D (2014) Drilling of Inconel 718 with geometry-modified twist drills. Proc CIRP 9:49–55
32. Raffel M, Willert CE, Scarano F et al (2018) Particle image velocimetry. Springer International Publishing, Cham
33. Westerweel J, Elsinga GE, Adrian RJ (2013) Particle image velocimetry for complex and turbulent flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 45:409–436
34. Blazek J (2015) Computational fluid dynamics principles and applications. Heinemann, Butterworth
35. Chorin AJ, Marsden JE (2000) A mathematical introduction to fluid mechanics, 3rd edn. Springer, New York
36. Fletcher CAJ (2006) Computational techniques for fluid dynamics 2, Springer, Berlin
37. Hosain L (2018) Fluid flow and heat transfer simulations for complex industrial applications. Dissertation, Mälardalen University Press, Sweden
38. Alfonsi G (2009) Reynolds-averaged navier-stokes equations for turbulence modeling. Appl Mech Rev 62:040802–040822
39. Durbin PA (2018) Turbulence closure models for computational fluid dynamics. In: Stein E, de Borst R, Hughes TJR (eds) Encyclopedia of computational mechanics, vol 63, 2nd edn, Chichester, UK, pp 1–22
40. Menter FR (1994) Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J 32:1598–1605
41. Wilcox DC (1988) Reassessment of the scale-determining equation for advanced turbulence models. AIAA J 26:1299–1310
42. Russo F, Basse NT (2016) Scaling of turbulence intensity for low-speed flow in smooth pipes. Flow Meas Instrum 52:101–114
43. Markatos NC (1986) The mathematical modelling of turbulent flows. Appl Math Model 10:190–220
