Numerical simulation for the comparison of thermal and plastic material flow behavior between symmetrical and asymmetrical boundary conditions during friction stir welding

  • Hao Su ,
  • Chuan-Song Wu
Expand
  • MOE Key Lab for Liquid-Solid Structure Evolution and Materials Processing, Institute of Materials Joining, Shandong University, Jinan, 250061, People's Republic of China

Received date: 2021-10-27

  Revised date: 2022-01-17

  Online published: 2023-02-16

Supported by

The authors are grateful for the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 52005297 and 52035005).

Abstract

An accurate description of the contact condition between the tool and the workpiece material is one of the most important issues for expounding the underlying multi-physics coupled mechanism during friction stir welding (FSW) process. In the present study, a novel asymmetrical boundary condition around the tool-workpiece contact interface is proposed for the FSW of AA2024-T4 alloy. A three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics model is employed for the comparison of the coupled thermal and plastic material flow behavior between asymmetrical and symmetrical boundary conditions. Numerical results of heat generation, temperature distribution, tunnel defect formation and material flow streamline during the welding process are quantitatively analyzed. Besides, various experimental measuring methods are utilized to obtain information about temperature, thermal cycle, tool torque and horizontal cross-section around the exiting keyhole. It is revealed that the modeling results of heat flux density and temperature distribution around the pin, as well as material flow characteristics all change significantly for the two models with different boundary conditions. Particularly, the asymmetrical boundary condition is more capable of predicting temperature fluctuation, plastic material flow along the vertical direction, as well as tunnel defect formation during FSW. Therefore, the superiority of the model with asymmetrical boundary condition over the symmetrical one during the numerical simulation of FSW is elucidated.

The full text can be downloaded at https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40436-022-00408-y

Cite this article

Hao Su , Chuan-Song Wu . Numerical simulation for the comparison of thermal and plastic material flow behavior between symmetrical and asymmetrical boundary conditions during friction stir welding[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2023 , 11(1) : 143 -157 . DOI: 10.1007/s40436-022-00408-y

References

1. Zheng T, Ardolino M, Bacchetti A et al (2021) The applications of Industry 4.0 technologies in manufacturing context:a systematic literature review. Int J Prod Res 59:1922-1954
2. Graf A (2021) Aluminum alloys for lighweight automotive structures. In:Mallick PK (ed) Materials, design and manufacturing for lightweight vehicles, 2nd edn. Woodhead Publishing, pp 97-123
3. Li Y, Zou W, Lee B et al (2020) Research progress of aluminum alloy welding technology. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 109:1207-1218
4. Mishra RS, Ma ZY (2005) Friction stir welding and processing. Mat Sci Eng R 50:1-78
5. Gibson BT, Lammlein DH, Prater TJ et al (2014) Friction stir welding:process, automation, and control. J Manuf Process 16:56-73
6. Rai R, De A, Bhadeshia HKDH et al (2011) Review:friction stir welding tools. Sci Technol Weld Joi 16:325-342
7. Meng X, Huang Y, Cao J et al (2021) Recent progress on control strategies for inherent issues in friction stir welding. Prog Mater Sci 115:100706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100706
8. He X, Gu F, Ball A (2014) A review of numerical analysis of friction stir welding. Prog Mater Sci 65:1-66
9. Chen G, Zhang S, Zhu Y et al (2020) Thermo-mechanical analysis of friction stir welding:a review on recent advances. Acta Metall Sin-engl 33:3-12
10. Su H, Wu CS, Pittner A et al (2014) Thermal energy generation and distribution in friction stir welding of aluminum alloys. Energy 77:720-731
11. Colegrove PA, Shercliff HR (2006) CFD modeling of friction stir welding of thick plate 7449 aluminum alloy. Sci Technol Weld Joi 11:429-441
12. Chen G, Shi Q, Li Y et al (2013) Computational fluid dynamics studies on heat generation during friction stir welding of aluminum alloy. Comp Mater Sci 79:540-546
13. Hamilton C, Dymek S, Sommers A (2008) A thermal model of friction stir welding in aluminum alloys. Int J Mach Tool Manu 48:1120-1130
14. Song M, Kovacevic R (2003) Numerical and experimental study of the heat transfer process in friction stir welding. P I MechEng B-J Eng 217:73-85
15. Khandkar MZH, Khan JA, Reynolds AP (2003) Prediction of temperature distribution and thermal history during friction stir welding:input torque based model. Sci Technol Weld Joi 165:165-174
16. Schmidt HNB, Dickerson TL, Hattel JH (2006) Material flow in butt friction stir welds in AA2024-T3. Acta Mater 54:1199-1209
17. Schmidt HNB, Hattel JH, Wert J (2004) An analytical model for the heat generation in friction stir welding. Model Simul Mater Sc 12:143-157
18. Gerlich A, Yamamoto M, North TH (2007) Strain rates and grain growth in Al 5754 and Al 6061 friction stir spot welds. Metall Mater Trans A 38:1291-1302
19. Nandan R, DebRoy T, Bhadeshia HKDH (2008) Recent advances in friction stir welding-process, weldment structure and properties. Prog Mater Sci 53:980-1023
20. Nandan R, Roy GG, Lienert TJ et al (2007) Three-dimensional heat and material flow during friction stir welding of mild steel. Acta Mater 55:883-895
21. Arora A, Nandan R, Reynolds AP et al (2009) Torque, power requirement and stir zone geometry in friction stir welding through modeling and experiments. Scripta Mater 60:13-16
22. Heurtier P, Jones MJ, Desrayaud C et al (2006) Mechanical and thermal modeling of friction stir welding. J Mater Process Tech 171:348-357
23. Liechty BC, Webb BW (2008) Modeling the frictional boundary condition in friction stir welding. Int J Mach Tool Manu 48:1474-1485
24. Qian JW, Li JL, Xiong JT et al (2012) Periodic variation of torque and its relations to interfacial sticking and slipping during friction stir welding. Sci Technol Weld Joi 17:338-341
25. Su H, Wu CS, Bachmann M et al (2015) Numerical modeling for the effect of pin profiles on thermal and material flow characteristics in friction stir welding. Mater Design 77:114-125
26. Chen G, Feng Z, Zhu Y et al (2016) An alternative frictional boundary condition for computational fluid dynamics simulation of friction stir welding. J Mater Eng Perform 25:4016-4023
27. Chen G, Ma Q, Zhang S et al (2018) Computational fluid dynamics simulation of friction stir welding:a comparative study on different frictional boundary conditions. J Mater Sci Technol 34:128-134
28. Chen G, Li H, Wang G et al (2018) Effects of pin thread on the in-process material flow behavior during friction stir welding:a computational fluid dynamics study. Int J Mach Tool Manu 124:12-21
29. Gratecap F, Girard M, Marya S et al (2012) Exploring material flow in friction stir welding:tool eccentricity and formation of banded structures. Int J Mater Form 5:99-107
30. Mishra RS, De PS, Kumar N (2014) Friction stir welding and processing:science and engineering. Springer, Switzerland
31. Zhai M, Wu CS, Su H (2020) Influence of tool tilt angle on heat transfer and material flow in friction stir welding. J Manuf Process 59:98-112
32. Su H, Wu CS, Pittner A et al (2013) Simultaneous measurement of tool torque, traverse force and axial force in friction stir welding. J Manuf Process 15:495-500
33. Fonda RW, Rowenhorst DJ, Knipling KE (2019) 3D material flow in friction stir welds. Metall Mater Trans A 50:655-663
34. Fonda RW, Bingert JF, Colligan KJ (2004) Development of grain structure during friction stir welding. Scripta Mater 51:243-248
35. Su H, Wang T, Wu C (2021) Formation of the periodic material flow behaviour in friction stir welding. Sci Technol Weld Joi 26:286-293
36. Sheppard T, Jackson A (1997) Constitutive equations for use in prediction of flow stress during extrusion of aluminum alloys. Mater Sci Tech-lond 13:203-209
Outlines

/