Data-driven approach to predict the fatigue properties of ferrous metal materials using the cGAN and machine-learning algorithms

  • Si-Geng Li ,
  • Qiu-Ren Chen ,
  • Li Huang ,
  • Min Chen ,
  • Chen-Di Wei ,
  • Zhong-Jie Yue ,
  • Ru-Xue Liu ,
  • Chao Tong ,
  • Qing Liu
Expand
  • 1. School of Advanced Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, 215123, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China;
    2. Key Laboratory for Light-weight Materials, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, 210009, People's Republic of China;
    3. Materials Bigdata and Application Division, Material Academy Jitri, Suzhou, 215131, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China;
    4. School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, People's Republic of China

Received date: 2023-10-17

  Revised date: 2023-11-30

  Online published: 2024-09-07

Supported by

We would like to express our sincere appreciation for the support provided by the Jiangsu Industrial Technology Research Institute and the Yangtze Delta Region Institute of Advanced Materials. This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52205377), the National Key Research and Development Program (Grant No. 2022YFB4601804), and the Key Basic Research Project of Suzhou (Grant Nos. #SJC2022029, #SJC2022031).

Abstract

The stress-life curve (S-N) and low-cycle strain-life curve (E-N) are the two primary representations used to characterize the fatigue behavior of a material. These material fatigue curves are essential for structural fatigue analysis. However, conducting material fatigue tests is expensive and time-intensive. To address the challenge of data limitations on ferrous metal materials, we propose a novel method that utilizes the Random Forest Algorithm and transfer learning to predict the S-N and E-N curves of ferrous materials. In addition, a data-augmentation framework is introduced using a conditional generative adversarial network (cGAN) to overcome data deficiencies. By incorporating the cGAN-generated data, the accuracy (R2) of the Random Forest Algorithm-trained model is improved by 0.3-0.6. It is proven that the cGAN can significantly enhance the prediction accuracy of the machine-learning model and balance the cost of obtaining fatigue data from the experiment.

The full text can be downloaded at https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40436-024-00491-3

Cite this article

Si-Geng Li , Qiu-Ren Chen , Li Huang , Min Chen , Chen-Di Wei , Zhong-Jie Yue , Ru-Xue Liu , Chao Tong , Qing Liu . Data-driven approach to predict the fatigue properties of ferrous metal materials using the cGAN and machine-learning algorithms[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2024 , 12(3) : 447 -464 . DOI: 10.1007/s40436-024-00491-3

References

1. Long X, Lu C, Su Y et al (2023) Machine learning framework for predicting the low cycle fatigue life of lead-free solders. Eng Fail Anal 148:107228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107228
2. Hao S, Cui L, Jiang D et al (2013) A transforming metal nanocomposite with large elastic strain, low modulus, and high strength. Science 339(6124):1191-1194
3. Sun X, Zhou K, Shi S et al (2022) A new cyclical generative adversarial network based data augmentation method for multiaxial fatigue life prediction. Int J Fatigue 162:106996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106996
4. Zhang M, Sun CN, Zhang X et al (2019) High cycle fatigue life prediction of laser additive manufactured stainless steel:a machine learning approach. Int J Fatigue 128:105194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105194
5. Yang WK, Hu BL, Luo YW et al (2023) Understanding geometrical size effect on fatigue life of A588 steel using a machine learning approach. Int J Fatigue 172:107671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.107671
6. Wei X, Zhang C, Han S et al (2022) High cycle fatigue S-N curve prediction of steels based on transfer learning guided long short term memory network. Int J Fatigue 163:107050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107050
7. Zhan Z, Li H (2021) Machine learning based fatigue life prediction with effects of additive manufacturing process parameters for printed SS 316L. Int J Fatigue 142:105941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105941
8. He L, Wang Z, Ogawa Y et al (2022) Machine-learning-based investigation into the effect of defect/inclusion on fatigue behavior in steels. Int J Fatigue 155:106597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106597
9. Li H, Zhang J, Hu L et al (2023) Notch fatigue life prediction of micro-shot peened 25CRMO4 alloy steel:a comparison between fracture mechanics and machine learning methods. Eng Fract Mech 277:108992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108992
10. Zhou T, Sun X, Chen X (2023) A multiaxial low-cycle fatigue prediction method under irregular loading by ANN model with knowledge-based features. Int J Fatigue 176:107868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.107868
11. Srinivasan V (2003) Low cycle fatigue and creep-fatigue interaction behavior of 316L (N) stainless steel and life prediction by artificial neural network approach. Int J Fatigue 25(12):1327-1338
12. Michalski RS, Carbonell JG, Mitchell TM (1983) Machine learning an artificial intelligence approach. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg
13. Jones BA, Li W, Nachtsheim CJ et al (2007) Model discrimination-another perspective on model-robust designs. J Stat Plan Infer 137:1577-1583
14. Roy A (n.d.) A novel conditional wasserstein deep convolutional generative adversarial network_supp1-3288851.PDF. https://doi.org/10.1109/tai.2023.3288851/mm1
15. Goodfellow IJ, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M et al.(2014) Generative adversarial networks. arXiv:1406.2661. https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.2661
16. Zhu JY, Park T, Isola P et al (2017) Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle-consistent adversarial networks. In:IEEE international conference on computer vision (ICCV), Venice, Italy, pp 2242-2251
17. Liu MY, Tuzel O (2016) Coupled generative adversarial networks. arXiv:1606.07536. https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.07536
18. Zhang H, Goodfellow I, Metaxas D et al.(2019) Self-attention generative adversarial networks. arXiv:1805.08318. https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.08318
19. Brock A, Donahue J, Simonyan K (2019) Large scale gan training for high fidelity natural image synthesis. arXiv:1809.11096. https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.11096
20. Ma B, Wei X, Liu C et al (2020) Data augmentation in microscopic images for material data mining. NPJ Comput Mater 6(1):125. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-020-00392-6
21. Buehler EL, Buehler MJ (2022) End-to-end prediction of multimaterial stress fields and fracture patterns using cycle-consistent adversarial and transformer neural networks. Biomed Eng Adv 4:100038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bea.2022.100038
22. Liu F, Zhou S, Xia C et al (2016) Optimization of fatigue life distribution model and establishment of probabilistic S-N curves for a 165 KSI grade super high strength drill pipe steel. J Petrol Sci Eng 145:527-532
23. Li S, Xie X, Cheng C et al (2020) A modified coffin-manson model for ultra-low cycle fatigue fracture of structural steels considering the effect of stress triaxiality. Eng Fract Mech 237:107223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107223
24. Farhat H (2021) Operation, maintenance, and repair of land-based gas turbines. Elsevier, Amsterdam
25. Cooper CV, Fine ME (1985) Fatigue microcrack initiation in polycrystalline alpha-iron with polished and oxidized surfaces. Metall Trans A 16(4):641-649
26. Baldi P, Sadowski P (2014) The dropout learning algorithm. ArtifIntell 210:78-122
27. Goh ATC (1995) Back-propagation neural networks for modeling complex systems. Artif Intell Eng 9(3):143-151
28. Yin L, Zhang B (2021) Time series generative adversarial network controller for long-term smart generation control of microgrids. Appl Energ 281:116069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116069
29. Razmjoo A, Xanthopoulos P, Zheng QP (2017) Online feature importance ranking based on sensitivity analysis. Expert Syst Appl 85:397-406
30. Coli CA, Windmeijer FAG (1997) An R-squared measure of goodness of fit for some common nonlinear regression models. J Econom 77(2):329-342
31. Miao C, Li R, Yu J (2020) Effects of characteristic parameters of corrosion pits on the fatigue life of the steel wires. J Constr Steel Res 168:105879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2019.105879
32. Parzinger M, Hanfstaengl L, Sigg F et al (2022) Comparison of different training data sets from simulation and experimental measurement with artificial users for occupancy detection-using machine learning methods random forest and lasso. Build Environ 223:109313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109313
33. Itabashi M, Kawata K (2000) Carbon content effect on high-strain-rate tensile properties for carbon steels. Int J Impact Eng 24(2):117-131
34. Rodrigues CAD, Bandeira RM, Duarte BB et al (2016) Effect of phosphorus content on the mechanical, microstructure and corrosion properties of supermartensitic stainless steel. Mat Sci Eng A 650:75-83
35. Meiners T, Peng Z, Gault B et al (2018) Sulfur-induced embrittlement in high-purity, polycrystalline copper. Acta Mater 156:64-75
36. Jain S, Jain P, Pandey K et al (2022) Artificial intelligence, machine learning, and mental health in pandemics. https://doi.org/10.1016/c2020-0-04085-5
37. He K, Zhang X, Ren S et al (2015) Deep residual learning for image recognition. arXiv:1512.03385. https://arxiv.org/abs/1512.03385
38. Yamashita R, Nishio M, Do RKG et al (2018) Convolutional neural networks:an overview and application in radiology. Insights Imaging 9(4):611-629
39. Ana Cláudia OES, de Souza MB, da Silva FV (2022) Exploring the potential of fully convolutional neural networks for FDD of a chemical process. Comput Aided Chem Eng 49:1621-1626
40. Kurek A, Kurek M,Łagoda T (2019) Stress-life curve for high and low cycle fatigue. J Theor App Mech 57(3):677-684
Outlines

/