Modeling the density gradient of 3D nanofiber scaffolds fabricated by divergence electrospinning

doi:10.1007/s40436-020-00307-0

摘要/Abstract

摘要： Following recent insights on structure-cellfunction interactions and the critical role of the extracellular matrix (ECM), the latest biofabrication approaches have increasingly focused on designing materials with biomimetic microarchitecture. Divergence electrospinning is a novel fabrication method for three-dimensional (3D) nanofiber scaffolds. It is introduced to produce 3D nanofiber mats that have numerous applications in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering. One of the most important characteristics of 3D nanofiber mats is the density gradient. This study provides a statistical analysis and response surface modeling framework based on experimental data to evaluate the manner by which the geometric designs of double-bevel collectors influence the fiber density gradient. Specifically, variance of analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed to identify parameters that had significant effects, and a response surface model embedded with seven location indicators was developed to predict the spatial distribution of fiber density for different collector designs. It was concluded that the collector height, bevel angle, and their interactions were significant factors influencing the density gradient. This study revealed the sensitivity of system configuration and provided an optimization tool for process controllability of microstructure gradients.

The full text can be downloaded at https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs40436-020-00307-0

关键词: Electrospinning, 3D nanofiber scaffold, Statistical model, Design of experiments, Response surface method

Abstract: Following recent insights on structure-cellfunction interactions and the critical role of the extracellular matrix (ECM), the latest biofabrication approaches have increasingly focused on designing materials with biomimetic microarchitecture. Divergence electrospinning is a novel fabrication method for three-dimensional (3D) nanofiber scaffolds. It is introduced to produce 3D nanofiber mats that have numerous applications in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering. One of the most important characteristics of 3D nanofiber mats is the density gradient. This study provides a statistical analysis and response surface modeling framework based on experimental data to evaluate the manner by which the geometric designs of double-bevel collectors influence the fiber density gradient. Specifically, variance of analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed to identify parameters that had significant effects, and a response surface model embedded with seven location indicators was developed to predict the spatial distribution of fiber density for different collector designs. It was concluded that the collector height, bevel angle, and their interactions were significant factors influencing the density gradient. This study revealed the sensitivity of system configuration and provided an optimization tool for process controllability of microstructure gradients.

The full text can be downloaded at https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs40436-020-00307-0

Key words: Electrospinning, 3D nanofiber scaffold, Statistical model, Design of experiments, Response surface method

Muhammad Adib Uz Zaman, Dilshan Sooriyaarachchi, Ying-Ge Zhou, George Z. Tan, Dong-Ping Du. Modeling the density gradient of 3D nanofiber scaffolds fabricated by divergence electrospinning[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2021, 9(3): 414-429.

参考文献

1. Jin G, He R, Sha B et al (2018) Electrospun three-dimensional aligned nanofibrous scaffolds for tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C 92:995-1005
2. Cui W, Zhou Y, Chang J (2010) Electrospun nanofibrous materials for tissue engineering and drug delivery. Sci Technol Adv Mater 11(1):014108
3. Kowalewski TA, Barral S, Kowalczyk T (2009) Modeling electrospinning of nanofibers. In:Proceedings of the IUTAM symposium on modelling nanomaterials and nanosystems, Aalborg, Denmark, 19-22 May 2008, pp 279-292
4. Šimko M, Lukáš D (2016) Mathematical modeling of a whipping instability of an electrically charged liquid jet. Appl Math Model 40(21/22):9565-9583
5. Taylor GI (1969) Electrically driven jets. Proc R Soc Lond A 313(1515):453-475
6. Li WJ, Laurencin CT, Caterson EJ et al (2002) Electrospun nanofibrous structure:a novel scaffold for tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res 60(4):613-621
7. Rezvani Z, Venugopal JR, Urbanska AM et al (2016) A bird's eye view on the use of electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering:current state-of-the-art, emerging directions and future trends. Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med 12(7):2181-2200
8. Rim NG, Shin CS, Shin H (2013) Current approaches to electrospun nanofibers for tissue engineering. Biomed Mater 8(1):014102
9. Park JS (2011) Electrospinning and its applications. Adv Nat Sci Nanosci Nanotechnol 1(4):043002. https://doi.org/10.1088/2043-6262/1/4/043002
10. Jiang T, Carbone EJ, Lo KWH et al (2015) Electrospinning of polymer nanofibers for tissue regeneration. Prog Polym Sci 46:1-24
11. Zhou Y, Hu Z, Du D et al (2018) The effects of collector geometry on the internal structure of the 3D nanofiber scaffold fabricated by divergent electrospinning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 100:3045-3054
12. Zhou Y, Tan GZ (2018) Generation of 3D nanofiber structure by divergence electrospinning for tissue engineering scaffold. In:The 13th international manufacturing science and engineering conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, College Station, Texas, USA
13. Tan GZ, Zhou Y (2018) Tunable 3D nanofiber architecture of polycaprolactone by divergence electrospinning for potential tissue engineering applications. Nano Micro Lett 10(4):73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-018-0226-0
14. Montgomery DC (2017) Design and analysis of experiments. Wiley, New York
15. Wu CJ, Hamada MS (2011) Experiments:planning, analysis, and optimization. Wiley, New York
16. Jeff CFH (2009) Experiments:planning, analysis, and optimization. Wiley, New York
17. Becker W, Tarantola S, Deman G (2018) Sensitivity analysis approaches to high-dimensional screening problems at low sample size. J Stat Comput Simul 88(11):2089-2110
18. Becker W, Rowson J, Oakley J et al (2011) Bayesian sensitivity analysis of a model of the aortic valve. J Biomech 44(8):1499-1506
19. Subia B, Kundu J, Kundu S (2010) Biomaterial scaffold fabrication techniques for potential tissue engineering applications. Tissue Engineering, London
20. Lund AW, Yener B, Stegemann JP et al (2009) The natural and engineered 3D microenvironment as a regulatory cue during stem cell fate determination. Tissue Eng B Rev 15(3):371-380
21. Michel G, Tonon T, Scornet D et al (2010) The cell wall polysaccharide metabolism of the brown alga Ectocarpus siliculosus. Insights into the evolution of extracellular matrix polysaccharides in Eukaryotes. New Phytol 188(1):82-97
22. Alberts B, Bray D, Hopkin K et al (2013) Essential cell biology. Garland Science, New York
23. Ahn H, Kim KJ, Park SY et al (2014) 3D braid scaffolds for regeneration of articular cartilage. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 34:37-46
24. Tamayol A, Akbari M, Annabi N et al (2013) Fiber-based tissue engineering:progress, challenges, and opportunities. Biotechnol Adv 31(5):669-687
25. Younesi M, Islam A, Kishore V et al (2014) Tenogenic induction of human MSCs by anisotropically aligned collagen biotextiles. Adv Func Mater 24(36):5762-5770
26. Pedde RD, Mirani B, Navaei A et al (2017) Emerging biofabrication strategies for engineering complex tissue constructs. Adv Mater 29(19):1606061. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201606061
27. Cui L, Zhang N, Cui W et al (2015) A novel nano/micro-fibrous scaffold by melt-spinning method for bone tissue engineering. J Bionic Eng 12(1):117-128
28. Puppi D, Mota C, Gazzarri M et al (2012) Additive manufacturing of wet-spun polymeric scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomed Microdevice 14(6):1115-1127
29. Jun Y, Kang E, Chae S et al (2014) Microfluidic spinning of micro-and nano-scale fibers for tissue engineering. Lab Chip 14(13):2145-2160
30. Khalili S, Nouri Khorasani S, Razavi M et al (2018) Nanofibrous scaffolds with biomimetic structure. J Biomed Mater Res A 106(2):370-376
31. Choi JS, Lee SJ, Christ GJ et al (2008) The influence of electrospun aligned poly (epsilon-caprolactone)/collagen nanofiber meshes on the formation of self-aligned skeletal muscle myotubes. Biomaterials 29(19):2899-2906
32. Yeo M, Kim GH (2018) Anisotropically aligned cell-laden nanofibrous bundle fabricated via cell electrospinning to regenerate skeletal muscle tissue. Small 14(48):1803491. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201803491
33. Ghasemi-Mobarakeh L, Prabhakaran MP, Morshed M et al (2008) Electrospun poly (e-caprolactone)/gelatin nanofibrous scaffolds for nerve tissue engineering. Biomaterials 29(34):4532-4539
34. Gnavi S, Fornasari B, Tonda-Turo C et al (2018) In vitro evaluation of gelatin and chitosan electrospun fibres as an artificial guide in peripheral nerve repair:a comparative study. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 12(2):679-694
35. Kitsara M, Agbulut O, Kontziampasis D et al (2017) Fibers for hearts:a critical review on electrospinning for cardiac tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 48:20-40
36. Sahoo S, Ouyang H, Goh JCH et al (2006) Characterization of a novel polymeric scaffold for potential application in tendon/ligament tissue engineering. Tissue Eng 12(1):91-99
37. Vaquette C, Sudheesh Kumar P, Petcu EB et al (2018) Combining electrospinning and cell sheet technology for the development of a multiscale tissue engineered ligament construct (TELC). J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 106(1):399-409
38. Shalumon K, Sheu C, Chen CH et al (2018) Multi-functional electrospun antibacterial core-shell nanofibrous membranes for prolonged prevention of post-surgical tendon adhesion and inflammation. Acta Biomater 72:121-136
39. Li WJ, Tuli R, Okafor C et al (2005) A three-dimensional nanofibrous scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering using human mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials 26(6):599-609
40. Girão AF, Semitela Â, Ramalho G et al (2018) Mimicking nature:fabrication of 3D anisotropic electrospun polycaprolactone scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering applications. Compos B Eng 154:99-107
41. Therapeutic Category, and Segment Forecasts, 2018-2025 (2017) Regenerative medicine market analysis by product (therapeutics {primary cell-based, stem cell-based, immunotherapies, and gene therapies}, tools, banks, and services). Grand View Research
42. Tseng Q, Duchemin-Pelletier E, Deshiere A et al (2012) Spatial organization of the extracellular matrix regulates cell-cell junction positioning. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109(5):1506-1511
43. Geckil H, Xu F, Zhang X et al (2010) Engineering hydrogels as extracellular matrix mimics. Nanomedicine 5(3):469-484
44. He J, Qin T, Liu Y et al (2014) Electrospinning of nanofibrous scaffolds with continuous structure and material gradients. Mater Lett 137:393-397
45. Samavedi S, Horton CO, Guelcher SA et al (2011) Fabrication of a model continuously graded co-electrospun mesh for regeneration of the ligament-bone interface. Acta Biomater 7(12):4131-4138
46. Singh M, Dormer N, Salash JR et al (2010) Three-dimensional macroscopic scaffolds with a gradient in stiffness for functional regeneration of interfacial tissues. J Biomed Mater Res A 94(3):870-876

[1]	Yu Dong, Jamie Milentis, Alokesh Pramanik. Additive manufacturing of mechanical testing samples based on virgin poly (lactic acid) (PLA) and PLA/wood fibre composites[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2018, 6(1): 71-82.
[2]	Lei-Lei Cui, Xiao-Wei Miao, Yu-Feng Song, Wen-Ying Fang, Hong-Bin Zhao, Jian-Hui Fang. Electrospinning synthesis of novel lithium-rich 0.4Li₂MnO₃·0.6LiNi_1/3Co_1/3Mn_1/3O₂ nanotube and its electrochemical performance as cathode of lithium-ion battery[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2016, 4(1): 79-88.
[3]	Thella Babu Rao, A. Gopala Krishna, Ramesh Kumar Katta, Konjeti Rama Krishna. Modeling and multi-response optimization of machining performance while turning hardened steel with self-propelled rotary tool[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2015, 3(1): 84-95.
[4]	Shashi Prakash Dwivedi, Satpal Sharma, Raghvendra Kumar Mishra. Effects of roller burnishing process parameters on surface roughness of A356/5%SiC composite using response surface methodology[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2014, 2(4): 303-317.
[5]	Yong-Ze Yu,Lu-Lu Zheng,Hai-Ping Chen,Wei-Hua Chen,Qing-Xi Hu. Fabrication of hierarchical polycaprolactone/gel scaffolds via combined 3D bioprinting and electrospinning for tissue engineering[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2014, 2(3): 231-238.