Ontology-based interoperability solutions for textile supply chain

doi:10.1007/s40436-014-0073-2

Abstract

Abstract: Existence of interoperability within the enterprises is essential for textile supply chain to efficiently face the challenges from contemporary competitors, to find new business opportunities and to render better customer service.Exchange of business documents, being semantically consistent, is the way to achieve interoperability. However,heterogeneity of the structures of the enterprises poses challenges for establishing interoperability. Ontology based semantic interoperability framework has now been proven as an effective solution for enterprise interoperability. In this paper, the existing ontology-based interoperability solutions in the context of textile supply chain have been compiled and research gaps have been identified.The ontological methods, such as unified process for ontology (UPON) and methontology have been analyzed, and UPON have been shown as a suitable ontology development method for textile supply chain.

Key words: Semantics, Ontology enterprise interoperability, Unified process for ontology (UPON) , Textile supply chain

Rishad Rayyaan ? Yi Wang ? Richard Kennon. Ontology-based interoperability solutions for textile supply chain[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2014, 2(2): 97-105.

TrendMD

References

1. Ramdas K, Spekman RE (2000) Chain or shackles: understanding what drives supply-chain performance. Interfaces 30(4):3–21

2. Frohlich MT, Westbrook R (2001) Arcs of integration: an international study of supply chain strategies. J Oper Manag 19(2):185–200

3. Rosenzweig ED, Roth AV, Dean JW Jr (2003) The influence of an integration strategy on competitive capabilities and business performance: an exploratory study of consumer products manufacturers.J Oper Manag 21(4):437–456

4. Cagliano R, Caniato F, Spina G (2004) Lean, agile and traditional supply: how do they impact manufacturing performance? J Purch Supply Manag 10(4):151–164

5. Teng SG, Jaramillo H (2006) Integrating the US textile and apparel supply chain with small companies in South America.Supply Chain Manag Int J 11(1):44–55

6. Handfield RB, Nichols EL (1999) Introduction to supply chain management, vol 183. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

7. Mun˜oza E, Capo´n-Garc?´ab E, Miguel LJ et al (2013) Integration of enterprise levels based on an ontological framework. Chem Eng Res Des 91(8):1542–1556

8. Grubic T, Fan I-S (2010) Supply chain ontology: review, analysis and synthesis. Comput Ind 61(8):776–786

9. Kumar K (2001) Technology for supporting supply chain management:introduction. Commun ACM 44(6):58–61

10. Buxmann P et al (2004) Usage and evaluation of supply chain management software—results of an empirical study in the European automotive industry. Inf Syst J 14(3):295–309

11. Gunasekaran A, Ngai EW (2004) Information systems in supply chain integration and management. Eur J Oper Res 159(2):269–295

12. Gessa N et al (2003) MODAML, an interoperability framework for the textile-clothing sector. In: IADIS international conference

13. IEEE office (1990) IEEE standard glossary of software engineering terminology. p 43

14. Guo J, Hu Z (2008) Common textile vocabularies and documents.ICE-B 2008, p 81

15. Davenport TH, Brooks JD (2004) Enterprise systems and the supply chain. J Enterp Inf Manag 17(1):8–19

16. Hillegersberg Jv, Kumar K (2000) ERP experience and evolution.Commun ACM 43(4):23–26

17. Akkermans HA et al (2003) The impact of ERP on supply chain management: exploratory findings from a European Delphi study.Eur J Oper Res 146(2):284–301

18. Cagliano R, Caniato F, Spina G (2006) The linkage between supply chain integration and manufacturing improvement programmes.Int J Oper Prod Manag 26(3):282–299

19. Pant S, Sethi R, Bhandari M (2003) Making sense of the e-supply chain landscape: an implementation framework. Int J Inf Manage 23(3):201–221

20. Uschold M, Gruninger M (1996) Ontologies: principles, methods and applications. Knowl Eng Rev 11(2):93–136

21. Smith B, Welty C (2001) Ontology: towards a new synthesis. In:Formal ontology in information systems. ACM Press, New York,pp iii–x

22. Guarino N (1998) Formal onthology in information systems:proceedings of the first international conference [FIOS’98], vol 46, June 6–8, Trento, Italy

23. Kishore R, Sharman R, Ramesh R (2004) Computational ontologies and information systems: I. foundations. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 14:158–183

24. De Sabbta P et al (2006) Providing a semantic description for an interoperability framework using ontologies. pp 197–204

25. Duque A et al (2009) An ontological solution to support interoperability in the textile industry. Springer, pp 38–51

26. Gruber TR (1995) Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. Int J Hum Comput Stud 43(5):907–928

27. Pinto HS, Martins JP (2004) Ontologies: how can they be built?Knowl Inf Syst 6(4):441–464

28. Berge J (1991) The EDIFACT standards. Wiley-Blackwell

29. TEDIS TE (1992) Systems programme, interim report. Office for official publications of the European Community, ISBN-92-826-5658-6

30. Robinet P, Dufour J. HLQ: description of the eTeXML project,Annex

31. TEX-WEAVE. Available from: http://www.texweave.org/

32. Dogac A et al (2008) iSURF: an interoperability service utility for collaborative supply chain planning across multiple domains.In: Proceedings of the eChallanges conference, Stockholm

33. Spohrer J, Kwan SK (2009) Service science, management,engineering, and design (SSMED): An emerging discipline-outline & references. Int J Inf Syst Serv Sect 1(3):1–31

34. Hofman W (2011) Design of large-scale enterprise interoperable value webs. In: Workshop on the move to meaningful Internet systems, pp 122–135

35. Ponn J, Lindemann U (2006) Intelligent search for product development information—an ontology-based approach. In:Marjanovic D (ed) 9th international design conference, Dubrovnik,Croatia

36. Lemaignan S et al (2006) MASON: a proposal for an ontology of manufacturing domain. In: IEEE workshop on distributed intelligent systems: collective intelligence and its applications,Prague, 15–16 June 2006

37. Ferna´ndez-Lo´pez M, Go´mez-Pe´rez A (2002) Overview and analysis of methodologies for building ontologies. Knowl Eng Rev 17(2):129–156

38. IEEE (1997) IEEE standard for developing software life-cycle process. In: IEEE Std 1074-1997, USA

39. Rajpathak D, Chougule R (2011) A generic ontology development framework for data integration and decision support in a distributed environment. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 24(2):154–170

40. De Nicola A, Missikoff M, Navigli R (2005) A proposal for a unified process for ontology building: UPON. In: Database and expert systems applications. Springer

41. Uschold M et al (1998) The enterprise ontology. Knowl Eng Rev 13(01):31–89

42. de Sousa JP (2000) Distributed planning and control systems for the virtual enterprise: organizational requirements and development life-cycle. J Intell Manuf 11(3):253–270

43. Madni AM, Lin W, Madni CC (2001) IDEONTM: an extensible ontology for designing, integrating, and managing collaborative distributed enterprises. Syst Eng 4(1):35–48

44. Lin H-K, Harding JA, Shahbaz M (2004) Manufacturing system engineering ontology for semantic interoperability across extended project teams. Int J Prod Res 42(24):5099–5118

45. Ye Y et al (2008) An ontology-based architecture for implementing semantic integration of supply chain management. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 21(1):1–18

46. Pourabbas E, Taglino F (2012) A semantic platform for enterprise knowledge interoperability. In: Poler R et al (ed) Enterprise interoperability V. Springer, London, pp 119–128

47. Gessa N et al (2006) Extracting a semantic view from an ebusiness vocabulary. In: The 8th IEEE international conference on and enterprise computing and the 3rd IEEE international conference on E-commerce, and E-services. San Francisco, USA,26–29 June 2006

48. de Nicola A, Missikoff M, Navigli R (2009) A software engineering approach to ontology building. Inf Syst 34(2):258–275

49. Jacobson I (1999) The unified software development process. 1st edn. Addison-Wesley Professional, US

50. Guizzardi G, Herre H, Wagner G (2002) Towards ontological foundations for UML conceptual models. In: On the move to meaningful internet systems 2002: CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE.Springer, pp 1100–1117

51. Daft R, Kendrick M, Vershinna N (2010) Management, 9th edn., Chap. 8. Cengage Learning EMEA, Hampshire

52. Golicic S, Davis D, McCarthy T, Mentzer J (2002) The impact of e-commerce on supply chain relationships. Int J Phys Distribution Logist Manag 32(10)851–871

53. Hoek R (2001) E-supply chains—virtually non-existing. Supply Chain Manag Int J 6(1):21–28

54. Slack N, Chambers S, Johnston R (2007) Operations management,5th edn. Pearson Education Limited, Essex, pp 423–424

55. Buchanan S, Gibb F (1998) The information audit: an integrated strategic approach. Int J Inf Manag 18(I)

56. Wagner C, Sweeney E (2010) E-business in supply chain management. In: Electronic supply network coordination in intelligent and dynamic environments, modelling and Hershey, PA: IGI Global, Chap 2, pp 24–42