Programming time-dependent behavior in 4D printing by geometric and printing parameters

doi:10.1007/s40436-024-00489-x

Abstract

Abstract: Smart structures realize sequential motion and self-assembly through external stimuli. With the advancement of four-dimensional (4D) printing, the programming of sequential motions of smart structures is endowed with more design and manufacturing possibilities. In this research, we present a method for physically programming the timescale of shape change in 4D-printed bilayer actuators to enable the sequential motion and self-assembly of smart structures. The effects of the geometric and printing parameters on the time-dependent behavior of 4D-printed bilayer actuators are investigated. The results show that the thickness of the active layer directly affects the timescale of motion, and increasing the thickness leads to faster motion until the thickness ratio is close to 4:6. Similarly, a higher printing speed results in faster motion. Conversely, a higher printing temperature and a greater layer height result in a slower shape change. The effects of the length-width ratio, line width, and filling ratio on the timescale of motion are not as straightforward. Finally, we demonstrate several smart structures that exhibit sequential motion, including a labyrinth-like self-folding structure that is choreographed to achieve multi-step self-shaping and a flower-shaped structure where each part completes its movement sequentially to avoid collisions. The presented method extends the programmability and functional capabilities of 4D printing.

The full text can be downloaded at https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40436-024-00489-x

Key words: Time-dependent behavior, Bilayer actuator, Four-dimensional (4D) printing, Smart structure

Yi-Cong Gao, Dong-Xin Duan, Si-Yuan Zeng, Hao Zheng, Li-Ping Wang, Jian-Rong Tan. Programming time-dependent behavior in 4D printing by geometric and printing parameters[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2024, 12(4): 726-741.

TrendMD

References

[1] Lendlein A, Behl M, Hiebl B et al (2010) Shape-memory polymers as a technology platform for biomedical applications. Expert Rev Med Dev 7(3):357-379
[2] Maidin S, Wee KJ, Sharum MA et al (2023) A review on 4D additive manufacturing—the application, smart materials & effect of various stimuli on 4D printed objects. J Teknol 85(8):63-71
[3] Aldawood FK (2023) A comprehensive review of 4D printing: state of the arts, opportunities, and challenges. Actuators 12(3):101. https://doi.org/10.3390/act12030101
[4] Carrell J, Gruss G, Gomez E (2020) Four-dimensional printing using fused-deposition modeling: a review. Rapid Prototyping J 26(5):855-869
[5] Sharma S, Chhetry A, Zhang SP et al (2021) Hydrogen-bond-triggered hybrid nanofibrous membrane-based wearable pressure sensor with ultrahigh sensitivity over a broad pressure range. ACS Nano 15(3):4380-4393
[6] Wu HZ, Zhang X, Ma Z et al (2020) A material combination concept to realize 4D printed products with newly emerging property/functionality. Adv Sci 7(9):1903208. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201903208
[7] Wang X, Xia Z, Zhao C et al (2020) Microstructured flexible capacitive sensor with high sensitivity based on carbon fiber-filled conductive silicon rubber. Sensor Actuat A-Phys 312:112147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2020.112147
[8] Kurakula M, Koteswara Rao GSN (2020) Moving polyvinyl pyrrolidone electrospun nanofibers and bioprinted scaffolds toward multidisciplinary biomedical applications. Eur Polym J 136:109919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2020.109919
[9] Tao R, Ji L, Li Y et al (2020) 4D printed origami metamaterials with tunable compression twist behavior and stress-strain curves. Compos Part B-Eng 201:108344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108344
[10] Zeng S, Feng Y, Gao Y et al (2022) Layout design and application of 4D-printing bio-inspired structures with programmable actuators. Bio-Des Manuf 5(1):189-200
[11] Stuart MAC, Huck WTS, Genzer J et al (2010) Emerging applications of stimuli-responsive polymer materials. Nat mater 9(2):101-113
[12] Sun L, Huang WM, Ding Z et al (2012) Stimulus-responsive shape memory materials: a review. Mater Des 33:577-640
[13] Gladman SA, Matsumoto EA, Nuzzo RG et al (2016) Biomimetic 4D printing. Nat mater 15(4):413-418
[14] Deng D, Chen Y (2015) Origami-based self-folding structure design and fabrication using projection based stereolithography. J Mech Des 137(2):021701. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4029066
[15] Peraza-Hernandez EA, Hartl DJ, Malak RJ Jr (2013) Design and numerical analysis of an SMA mesh-based self-folding sheet. Smart Mater Struct 22(9):094008. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/22/9/094008
[16] Le Duigou A, Castro M, Bevan R et al (2016) 3D printing of wood fibre biocomposites: from mechanical to actuation functionality. Mater Des 96:106-114
[17] Teoh JEM, Zhao Y, An J et al (2017) Multi-stage responsive 4D printed smart structure through varying geometric thickness of shape memory polymer. Smart Mater Struct 26(12):125001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/aa908a
[18] Correa D, Poppinga S, Mylo MD et al (2020) 4D pine scale: biomimetic 4D printed autonomous scale and flap structures capable of multi-phase movement. Philos T R Soc A 378(2167):20190445. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2019.0445
[19] Alshebly YS, Nafea M (2023) Effects of printing parameters on 4D-printed PLA actuators. Smart Mater Struct 32(6):064008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/acd504
[20] Wang J, Wang Z, Song Z et al (2019) Programming multistage shape memory and variable recovery force with 4D printing parameters. Adv Mater Technol 4(11):1900535. https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.201900535
[21] Ghazal AF, Zhang M, Mujumdar AS et al (2022) Progress in 4D/5D/6D printing of foods: applications and R&D opportunities. Crit Rev Food Sci 63(25):7399-7422
[22] Testoni O, Lumpe T, Huang JL et al (2021) A 4D printed active compliant hinge for potential space applications using shape memory alloys and polymers. Smart Mater Struct 30(8):085004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/ac01fa
[23] Bodaghi M, Damanpack AR, Liao WH (2016) Self-expanding/shrinking structures by 4D printing. Smart Mater Struct 25(10):105034. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/25/10/105034
[24] Mao Y, Yu K, Isakov MS et al (2015) Sequential self-folding structures by 3D printed digital shape memory polymers. Sci Rep 5:13616. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep13616
[25] Lai J, Ye X, Liu J et al (2021) 4D printing of highly printable and shape morphing hydrogels composed of alginate and methylcellulose. Mater Des 205:109699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109699
[26] Yamamura S, Iwase E (2021) Hybrid hinge structure with elastic hinge on self-folding of 4D printing using a fused deposition modeling 3D printer. Mater Des 203:109605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109605
[27] Soleimanzadeh H, Rolfe B, Bodaghi M et al (2020) Closed-loop 4D-printed soft robots. Mater Des 188:108411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108411
[28] Zhou X, Ren L, Song Z et al (2023) Advances in 3D/4D printing of mechanical metamaterials: from manufacturing to applications. Compos Part B-Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110585
[29] Le Duigou A, Fruleux T, Matsuzaki R et al (2021) 4D printing of continuous flax-fibre based shape-changing hygromorph biocomposites: towards sustainable metamaterials. Mater Des 211:110158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110158
[30] Demoly F, Dunn ML, Wood KL et al (2021) The status, barriers, challenges, and future in design for 4D printing. Mater Des 212:110193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110193
[31] Li X, Fan L, Li R et al (2023) 3D/4D printing of β-cyclodextrin-based high internal phase emulsions. J Food Eng 348:111455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2023.111455
[32] Yao T, Wang Y, Zhu B et al (2020) 4D printing and collaborative design of highly flexible shape memory alloy structures: a case study for a metallic robot prototype. Smart Mater Struct 30(1):015018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/abcc0a
[33] Tahouni Y, Krüger F, Poppinga S et al (2021) Programming sequential motion steps in 4D-printed hygromorphs by architected mesostructure and differential hygro-responsiveness. Bioinspir Biomim 16(5):055002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/ac0c8e
[34] El Magri A, Vaudreuil S, Ayad B et al (2023) Effect of printing parameters on tensile, thermal and structural properties of 3D-printed poly (ether ketone ketone) PEKK material using fused deposition modeling. J Appl Polym Sci 29(140):54078. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.54078
[35] Zeng S, Gao Y, Feng Y et al (2019) Programming the deformation of a temperature-driven bilayer structure in 4D printing. Smart Mater Struct 28(10):105031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/ab39c9
[36] Zeng S, Gao Y, Tan J et al (2022) Self-assembly by 4D printing: design and fabrication of sequential self-folding. In: Proceedings of the ASME conference on smart materials, adaptive structures and intelligent systems, Vol 86274, p V001T03A005. https://doi.org/10.1115/SMASIS2022-89459
[37] Timoshenko S (1925) Analysis of bi-metal thermostats. J Opt Soc Am 11(3):233-255
[38] Zeng S, Gao Y, Qiu H et al (2022) Design, fabrication and application of self-spiraling pattern-driven 4D-printed actuator. Sci Rep 12:18874. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23425-0
[39] Westbrook KK, Parakh V, Chung T et al (2010) Constitutive modeling of shape memory effects in semicrystalline polymers with stretch induced crystallization. J Eng Mater Technol 132(4):041010. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4001964