Review of empowering computer-aided engineering with artificial intelligence

doi:10.1007/s40436-025-00545-0

Abstract

Abstract: Computer-aided engineering (CAE) is widely used in the industry as an approximate numerical analysis method for solving complex engineering and product structural mechanical performance problems. However, with the increasing complexity of structural and performance requirements, the traditional research paradigm based on experimental observations, theoretical modeling, and numerical simulations faces new scientific problems and technical challenges in analysis, design, and manufacturing. Notably, the development of CAE applications in future engineering is constrained to some extent by insufficient experimental observations, lack of theoretical modeling, limited numerical analysis, and difficulties in result validation. By replacing traditional mathematical mechanics models with data-driven models, artificial intelligence (AI) methods directly use high-dimensional, high-throughput data to establish complex relationships between variables and capture laws that are difficult to discover using traditional mechanics research methods, offering significant advantages in the analysis, prediction, and optimization of complex systems. Empowering CAE with AI to find new solutions to the difficulties encountered by traditional research methods has become a developing trend in numerical simulation research. This study reviews the methods and applications of combining AI with CAE and discusses current research deficiencies as well as future research trends.

The full text can be downloaded at https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-025-00545-0

Key words: Artificial intelligence (AI), Computer-aided engineering (CAE), Deep learning (DL), Computational mechanics

Xu-Wen Zhao, Xiao-Meng Tong, Fang-Wei Ning, Mao-Lin Cai, Fei Han, Hong-Guang Li. Review of empowering computer-aided engineering with artificial intelligence[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2026, 14(1): 103-143.

TrendMD

References

[1] Dopker B (1988) Developments in interdisciplinary simulation and design software for mechanical systems. Eng Comput 4:229-238
[2] Walker RA, Shah SC, Gupta NK (1984) Computer-aided engineering (CAE) for system analysis. Proc IEEE 72:1732-1745
[3] Chen Y, Zhang J, Li Z et al (2023) Intelligent methods for optimization design of lightweight fiber-reinforced composite structures: a review and the-state-of-the-art. Front Mater 10:1125328. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2023.1125328
[4] Black N, Najafi AR (2022) Learning finite element convergence with the multi-fidelity graph neural network. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 397:115120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2022.115120
[5] Li YF, Minh HL, Khatir S et al (2023) Structure damage identification in dams using sparse polynomial chaos expansion combined with hybrid K-means clustering optimizer and genetic algorithm. Eng Struct 283:115891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115891
[6] Oishi A, Yagawa G (2021) Finite elements using neural networks and a Posteriori error. Arch Comput Methods Eng 28:3433-3456
[7] Erick RC, Hernan LP, LuisF ZP et al (2017) Process chain for the fabrication of a custom 3D barrier for guided bone regeneration. Procedia CIRP 65:151-156
[8] Gronostajski Z (2000) The constitutive equations for FEM analysis. J Mater Process Technol 106:40-44
[9] Pu B, Song P, Li WB et al (2022) Plastic deformation behavior and constitutive modeling of Cu-50Ta alloy during hot compression. Mater Res Express 9:016517. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ac49bd
[10] Liu X, Gasco F, Goodsell J et al (2019) Initial failure strength prediction of woven composites using a new yarn failure criterion constructed by deep learning. Compos Struct 230:111505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111505
[11] Furukawa T, Yagawa G (1998) Implicit constitutive modelling for viscoplasticity using neural networks. Int J Numer Methods Eng 43:195-219
[12] Shin H, Kim JB (2010) A phenomenological constitutive equation to describe various flow stress behaviors of materials in wide strain rate and temperature regimes. J Eng Mater Technol 132:021009. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4000225
[13] Alexis R, Rodríguez-Martínez JA (2009) Thermo-viscoplastic constitutive relation for aluminium alloys, modeling of negative strain rate sensitivity and viscous drag effects. Mater Des 30:4377-4390
[14] Csáji BC (2001) Approximation with artificial neural networks. Dissertation, Eotvos Lorand University
[15] Liu X, Tian S, Tao F et al (2021) A review of artificial neural networks in the constitutive modeling of composite materials. Compos Part B Eng 224:109152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109152
[16] Feng XT, Yang C (2001) Genetic evolution of nonlinear material constitutive models. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190:5957-5973
[17] Tao F, Liu X, Du H et al (2022) Finite element coupled positive definite deep neural networks mechanics system for constitutive modeling of composites. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 391:114548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2021.114548
[18] Tao F, Liu X, Du H et al (2021) Learning composite constitutive laws via coupling Abaqus and deep neural network. Compos Struct 272:114137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114137
[19] Stoffel M, Bamer F, Markert B (2018) Artificial neural networks and intelligent finite elements in non-linear structural mechanics. Thin-Walled Struct 131:102-106
[20] Stoffel M, Bamer F, Markert B (2019) Neural network based constitutive modeling of nonlinear viscoplastic structural response. Mech Res Commun 95:85-88
[21] Bahtiri B, Arash B, Scheffler S et al (2023) A machine learning-based viscoelastic-viscoplastic model for epoxy nanocomposites with moisture content. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 415:116293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2023.116293
[22] Khorrami MS, Mianroodi JR, Siboni NH et al (2023) An artificial neural network for surrogate modeling of stress fields in viscoplastic polycrystalline materials. Npj Comput Mater 9:37. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-023-00991-z
[23] Liu X, Yan Z, Zhong Z (2021) Predicting elastic modulus of porous La_0.6Sr_0.4Co_0.2Fe_0.8O_3?δ cathodes from microstructures via FEM and deep learning. Int J Hydrog Energy 46:22079-22091
[24] Yao H, Gao Y, Liu Y (2020) FEA-Net: a physics-guided data-driven model for efficient mechanical response prediction. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 363:112892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2020.112892
[25] Frankel A, Hamel CM, Bolintineanu D et al (2022) Machine learning constitutive models of elastomeric foams. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 391:114492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2021.114492
[26] Qu T, Di S, Feng YT et al (2021) Towards data-driven constitutive modelling for granular materials via micromechanics-informed deep learning. Int J Plast 144:103046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2021.103046
[27] Sencu RM, Yang Z, Wang YC et al (2016) Generation of micro-scale finite element models from synchrotron X-ray CT images for multidirectional carbon fibre reinforced composites. Compos Part Appl Sci Manuf 91:85-95
[28] Huang W, Causse P, Brailovski V et al (2019) Reconstruction of mesostructural material twin models of engineering textiles based on micro-CT aided geometric modeling. Compos Part Appl Sci Manuf 124:105481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105481
[29] Yang H, Wang W, Li C et al (2022) Deep learning-based X-ray computed tomography image reconstruction and prediction of compression behavior of 3D printed lattice structures. Addit Manuf 54:102774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2022.102774
[30] Sinchuk Y, Shishkina O, Gueguen M et al (2022) X-ray CT based multi-layer unit cell modeling of carbon fiber-reinforced textile composites: segmentation, meshing and elastic property homogenization. Compos Struct 298:116003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116003
[31] Polyzos E, Nikolaou C, Polyzos D et al (2023) Direct modeling of the elastic properties of single 3D printed composite filaments using X-ray computed tomography images segmented by neural networks. Addit Manuf 76:103786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2023.103786
[32] Zheng J, Qian K, Zhang D (2024) Reverse reconstruction of geometry modeling and numerical verification of 2.5D woven composites based on deep learning. Compos Struct 329:117801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117801
[33] Ghane E, Fagerstr?m M, Mirkhalaf SM (2023) A multiscale deep learning model for elastic properties of woven composites. Int J Solids Struct 282:112452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2023.112452
[34] Baker TJ (2005) Mesh generation: art or science? Prog Aerosp Sci 41:29-63
[35] Chawner JR, Taylor NJ (2019) Progress in geometry modeling and mesh generation toward the CFD vision 2030. In: AIAA aviation 2019 forum. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Dallas
[36] Mahmood R, Jimack PK (2004) Locally optimal unstructured finite element meshes in 3 dimensions. Comput Struct 82:2105-2116
[37] Wang N, Lu P, Chang X et al (2021) Preliminary investigation on unstructured mesh generation technique based on advancing front method and machine learning methods. Chin J Theor Appl Mech 53:740-751
[38] Mavriplis DJ (1997) Unstructured grid techniques. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 29:473-514
[39] Thompson JF (1992) The national grid project. Comput Syst Eng 3:393-399
[40] Lei N, Li Z, Xu Z et al (2024) What’s the situation with intelligent mesh generation: a survey and perspectives. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 30:4997-5017
[41] Ahn CH, Lee SS, Lee HJ et al (1991) A self-organizing neural network approach for automatic mesh generation. IEEE Trans Magn 27:4201-4204
[42] Alfonzetti S, Coco S, Cavalieri S et al (1996) Automatic mesh generation by the let-it-grow neural network. IEEE Trans Magn 32:1349-1352
[43] Lu H, Wu Y, Chen S (2003) A new method based on SOM network to generate coarse meshes for overlapping unstructured multigrid algorithm. Appl Math Comput 140:353-360
[44] Yao S, Yan B, Chen B et al (2005) An ANN-based element extraction method for automatic mesh generation. Expert Syst Appl 29:193-206
[45] Alfonzetti S, Dilettoso E, Salerno N (2008) An optimized generator of finite element meshes based on a neural network. IEEE Trans Magn 44:1278-1281
[46] Chen X, Li T, Wan Q et al (2022) MGNet: a novel differential mesh generation method based on unsupervised neural networks. Eng Comput 38:4409-4421
[47] Lu P, Wang N, Lin Y et al (2022) A new unstructured hybrid mesh generation method based on BP-ANN. J Phys Conf Ser 2280:012045. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2280/1/012045
[48] Xu Q, Nie Z, Xu H et al (2022) SuperMeshing: a new deep learning architecture for increasing the mesh density of physical fields in metal forming numerical simulation. J Appl Mech 89:011002. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4052195
[49] Rios T, Sendhoff B, Menzel S et al (2019) On the efficiency of a point cloud autoencoder as a geometric representation for shape optimization. In: 2019 IEEE symposium series on computational intelligence (SSCI), IEEE, Xiamen
[50] Zhang Z, Jimack PK, Wang H (2021) MeshingNet3D: efficient generation of adapted tetrahedral meshes for computational mechanics. Adv Eng Softw 157(158):103021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2021.103021
[51] Xu Z, Chen X, Chi L et al (2020) A mesh quality discrimination method based on convolutional neural network. In: 2020 IEEE international conference on artificial intelligence and computer applications (ICAICA), IEEE, Dalian
[52] Sengupta TK (2013) High accuracy computing methods: fluid flows and wave phenomena. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
[53] Carbonell JM, Monforte L, Ciantia MO et al (2022) Geotechnical particle finite element method for modeling of soil-structure interaction under large deformation conditions. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 14:967-983
[54] Zienkiewicz OC, Taylor RL (2005) The finite element method for solid and structural mechanics, 6th ed. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Amsterdam p 179-214
[55] Yao M, Anandarajah A (2003) Three-dimensional discrete element method of analysis of clays. J Eng Mech 129:585-596
[56] Belytschko T, Lu YY, Gu L (1994) Element-free Galerkin methods. Int J Numer Methods Eng 37:229-256
[57] Boyd JP (2001) Chebyshev and fourier spectral methods. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
[58] Roy AM, Bose R, Sundararaghavan V et al (2023) Deep learning-accelerated computational framework based on physics informed neural network for the solution of linear elasticity. Neural Netw 162:472-489
[59] Karniadakis GE, Kevrekidis IG, Lu L et al (2021) Physics-informed machine learning. Nat Rev Phys 3:422-440
[60] Takeuchi J, Kosugi Y (1994) Neural network representation of finite element method. Neural Netw 7:389-395
[61] Yagawa G, Aoki O (1995) A neural network-based finite element method on parallel processors. In: Batra RC (ed) Contemporary research in engineering science, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Heidelberg
[62] Ghavamian F, Simone A (2019) Accelerating multiscale finite element simulations of history-dependent materials using a recurrent neural network. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 357:112594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2019.112594
[63] Huang Z, Liang S, Zhang H et al (2023) On fast simulation of dynamical system with neural vector enhanced numerical solver. Sci Rep 13:15254. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42194-y
[64] Mianroodi JR, HSiboniRaabe ND (2021) Teaching solid mechanics to artificial intelligence—a fast solver for heterogeneous materials. Npj Comput Mater 7:99. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-021-00571-z
[65] Michoski C, Milosavljevi? M, Oliver T et al (2020) Solving differential equations using deep neural networks. Neurocomputing 399:193-212
[66] Raissi M (2018) Deep hidden physics models: deep learning of nonlinear partial differential equations. J Mach Learn Res 19:1-24
[67] Haghighat E, Raissi M, Moure A et al (2021) A physics-informed deep learning framework for inversion and surrogate modeling in solid mechanics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 379:113741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2021.113741
[68] Lagaris IE, Likas A, Fotiadis DI (1998) Artificial neural networks for solving ordinary and partial differential equations. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 9:987-1000
[69] Raissi M, Karniadakis GE (2018) Hidden physics models: machine learning of nonlinear partial differential equations. J Comput Phys 357:125-141
[70] Jin X, Cai S, Li H et al (2021) NSFnets (Navier-Stokes flow nets): physics-informed neural networks for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. J Comput Phys 426:109951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109951
[71] Sun L, Gao H, Pan S et al (2020) Surrogate modeling for fluid flows based on physics-constrained deep learning without simulation data. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 361:112732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2019.112732
[72] Lou Q, Meng X, Karniadakis GE (2021) Physics-informed neural networks for solving forward and inverse flow problems via the Boltzmann-BGK formulation. J Comput Phys 447:110676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110676
[73] Cai S, Wang Z, Wang S et al (2021) Physics-informed neural networks for heat transfer problems. J Heat Transf 143:060801. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4050542
[74] Shukla K, Jagtap AD, Blackshire JL et al (2022) A physics-informed neural network for quantifying the microstructural properties of polycrystalline nickel using ultrasound data: a promising approach for solving inverse problems. IEEE Signal Process Mag 39:68-77
[75] Jagtap AD, Mao Z, Adams N et al (2022) Physics-informed neural networks for inverse problems in supersonic flows. J Comput Phys 466:111402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111402
[76] Waheed UB, Haghighat E, Alkhalifah T et al (2021) PINNeik: eikonal solution using physics-informed neural networks. Comput Geosci 155:104833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104833
[77] McClenny LD, Braga-Neto UM (2023) Self-adaptive physics-informed neural networks. J Comput Phys 474:111722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111722
[78] De Ryck T, Jagtap AD, Mishra S (2023) Error estimates for physics informed neural networks approximating the Navier-Stokes equations. IMA J Numer Anal 44:83-119
[79] Jagtap AD, Kharazmi E, Karniadakis GE (2020) Conservative physics-informed neural networks on discrete domains for conservation laws: applications to forward and inverse problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 365:113028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2020.113028
[80] Jagtap AD, Karniadakis GEM (2020) Extended physics-informed neural networks (XPINNs): a generalized space-time domain decomposition based deep learning framework for nonlinear partial differential equations. Commun Comput Phys 28:2002-2041
[81] Lu Y, Li H, Zhang L et al (2023) Convolution hierarchical deep-learning neural networks (C-HiDeNN): finite elements, isogeometric analysis, tensor decomposition, and beyond. Comput Mech 72:333-362
[82] Park C, Lu Y, Saha S et al (2023) Convolution hierarchical deep-learning neural network (C-HiDeNN) with graphics processing unit (GPU) acceleration. Comput Mech 72:383-409
[83] Liu Y, Park C, Lu Y et al (2023) HiDeNN-FEM: a seamless machine learning approach to nonlinear finite element analysis. Comput Mech 72:173-194
[84] Du H, He Q (2024) Neural-integrated meshfree (NIM) method: a differentiable programming-based hybrid solver for computational mechanics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 427:117024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2024.117024
[85] Sun J, Liu Y, Wang Y et al (2023) BINN: a deep learning approach for computational mechanics problems based on boundary integral equations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 410:116012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2023.116012
[86] Dong Y, Liu T, Li Z et al (2023) DeepFEM: a novel element-based ceep learning approach for solving nonlinear partial differential equations in computational solid mechanics. J Eng Mech 149:04022102. https://doi.org/10.1061/JENMDT.EMENG-6643
[87] Spruegel T, Rothfelder R, Bickel S et al (2018) Methodology for plausibility checking of structural mechanics simulations using deep learning on existing simulation data. In: Proceedings of NordDesign 2018, Link?ping, Sweden
[88] Bickel S, Goetz S, Wartzack S (2023) Detection of plausibility and error reasons in finite element simulations with deep learning networks. Algorithms 16:209. https://doi.org/10.3390/a16040209
[89] Kiener A, Langer S, Bekemeyer P (2023) Data-driven correction of coarse grid CFD simulations. Comput Fluids 264:105971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2023.105971
[90] Hanna BN, Dinh NT, Youngblood RW et al (2020) Machine-learning based error prediction approach for coarse-grid computational fluid dynamics (CG-CFD). Prog Nucl Energy 118:103140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2019.103140
[91] Rutkowski DR, Roldán-Alzate A, Johnson KM (2021) Enhancement of cerebrovascular 4D flow MRI velocity fields using machine learning and computational fluid dynamics simulation data. Sci Rep 11:10240. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89636-z
[92] Sakong J, Woo SC, Kim TW (2019) Determination of impact fragments from particle analysis via smoothed particle hydrodynamics and k-means clustering. Int J Impact Eng 134:103387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.103387
[93] Morimoto M, Fukami K, Zhang K et al (2021) Convolutional neural networks for fluid flow analysis: toward effective metamodeling and low dimensionalization. Theor Comput Fluid Dyn 35:633-658
[94] Wetlesen D, Siegel S, Cohen K et al (2005) Sensor based proper orthogonal decomposition state estimation in the presence of noise. In: 43rd AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reno
[95] Bhaduri A, Gupta A, Graham-Brady L (2022) Stress field prediction in fiber-reinforced composite materials using a deep learning approach. Compos Part B Eng 238:109879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109879
[96] Ouyang B, Zhu LT, Luo ZH (2022) Machine learning for full spatiotemporal acceleration of gas-particle flow simulations. Powder Technol 408:117701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2022.117701
[97] Umetani N, Bickel B (2018) Learning three-dimensional flow for interactive aerodynamic design. ACM Trans Graph 37:1-10
[98] Wei J, Chu X, Sun X et al (2019) Machine learning in materials science. Info Mat 1:338-358
[99] Wu MY, Yuan XY, Chen ZH et al (2023) Airfoil shape optimization using genetic algorithm coupled deep neural networks. Phys Fluids 35:085140. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0160954
[100] Zhang Z, Zhang Z, Di CF et al (2022) Machine learning for accelerating the design process of double-double composite structures. Compos Struct 285:115233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115233
[101] Rezasefat M, Hogan JD (2023) A finite element-convolutional neural network model (FE-CNN) for stress field analysis around arbitrary inclusions. Mach Learn Sci Technol 4:045052. https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-2153/ad134a
[102] Luo L, Zhang B, Zhang G et al (2020) Rapid prediction of cured shape types of composite laminates using an FEM-ANN method. Compos Struct 238:111980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.111980
[103] Wang Q, Yang L, Rao Y (2021) Establishment of a generalizable model on a small-scale dataset to predict the surface pressure distribution of gas turbine blades. Energy 214:118878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118878
[104] Kobeissi H, Mohammadzadeh S, Lejeune E (2022) Enhancing mechanical metamodels with a generative model-based augmented training dataset. J Biomech Eng 144:121002. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4054898
[105] Wang Y, Liu T, Zhang D et al (2021) Dual-convolutional neural network based aerodynamic prediction and multi-objective optimization of a compact turbine rotor. Aerosp Sci Technol 116:106869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2021.106869
[106] Du P, Zhu X, Wang JX (2022) Deep learning-based surrogate model for three-dimensional patient-specific computational fluid dynamics. Phys Fluids 34:081906. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0101128
[107] Tao J, Sun G, Guo L et al (2020) Application of a PCA-DBN-based surrogate model to robust aerodynamic design optimization. Chin J Aeronaut 33:1573-1588
[108] Qin L, Liu S, Long T et al (2018) Wind field reconstruction using dimension-reduction of CFD data with experimental validation. Energy 151:272-288
[109] Zandsalimy M, Ollivier-Gooch C (2024) Residual vector and solution mode analysis using semi-supervised machine learning for mesh modification and CFD stability improvement. J Comput Phys 510:113063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2024.113063
[110] Huang W, Wang R, Zhang M et al (2024) The research on deep learning-driven dimensionality reduction and strain prediction techniques based on flight parameter data. Appl Sci 14:3938. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14093938
[111] Guo X, Li W, Iorio F (2016) Convolutional neural networks for steady flow approximation. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, ACM, San Francisco
[112] Guastoni L, Güemes A, Ianiro A et al (2021) Convolutional-network models to predict wall-bounded turbulence from wall quantities. J Fluid Mech 928:A27. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2021.812
[113] Wang Z, Xiao D, Fang F et al (2018) Model identification of reduced order fluid dynamics systems using deep learning. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 86:255-268
[114] Dinesh A, Rahul Prasad B (2024) Predictive models in machine learning for strength and life cycle assessment of concrete structures. Autom Constr 162:105412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2024.105412
[115] Montáns FJ, Cueto E, Bathe KJ (2023) Machine learning in computer aided engineering. In: Rabczuk T, Bathe KJ (eds) Machine learning in modeling and simulation: methods and applications, Springer International Publishing, Cham