Numerical simulation is an effective approach in studying cutting mechanism. The widely used methods for cutting simulation include finite element analysis and molecular dynamics. However, there exist some intrinsic shortcomings when using a mesh-based formulation, and the capable scale of molecular dynamics is extremely small. In contrast, smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) is a candidate to combine the advantages of them. It is a particle method which is suitable for simulating the large deformation process, and is formulated based on continuum mechanics so that large scale problems can be handled in principle. As a result, SPH has also become a main way for the cutting simulation. Since some issues arise while using conventional SPH to handle solid materials, the total Lagrangian smoothed particle hydrodynamics (TLSPH) is developed. But instabilities would still occur during the cutting, which is a critical issue to resolve. This paper studies the effects of TLSPH settings and cutting model parameters on the numerical instability, as well as the chip formation process. Plastic deformation, stress field and cutting forces are analyzed as well. It shows that the hourglass coefficient, critical pairwise deformation and time step are three important parameters to control the stability of the simulation, and a strategy on how to adjust them is provided.
The full text can be downloaded at https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40436-020-00297-z
Jin-Shi Wang
,
Xiao-Dong Zhang
,
Feng-Zhou Fang
. Numerical study via total Lagrangian smoothed particle hydrodynamics on chip formation in micro cutting[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2020
, 8(2)
: 144
-159
.
DOI: 10.1007/s40436-020-00297-z
1. Fang FZ, Xu FF (2018) Recent advances in micro/nano-cutting:effect of tool edge and material properties. Nanomanuf Metrol 1:4-31
2. Ng EG, El-Wardany TI, Dumitrescu M et al (2002) Physics-based simulation of high speed machining. Mach Sci Technol 6:301-329
3. Niu W, Mo R, Liu GR et al (2018) Modeling of orthogonal cutting process of A2024-T351 with an improved SPH method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95:905-919
4. Nasr MNA, Ng EG, Elbestawi MA (2007) Modelling the effects of tool-edge radius on residual stresses when orthogonal cutting AISI 316L. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 47:401-411
5. Movahhedy MR, Altintas Y, Gadala MS (2002) Numerical analysis of metal cutting with chamfered and blunt tools. J Manuf Sci Eng 124:178-188
6. Li S, Liu WK (2002) Meshfree and particle methods and their applications. Appl Mech Rev 55:1-34
7. Liu M, Zhang Z (2019) Smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) for modeling fluid-structure interactions. Sci China Phys Mech 62:984701
8. Ikawa N, Shimada S, Tanaka H (1992) Minimum thickness of cut in micromachining. Nanotechnology 3:6
9. Xiao G, To S, Zhang G (2015) Molecular dynamics modelling of brittle-ductile cutting mode transition:case study on silicon carbide. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 88:214-222
10. Pei QX, Lu C, Lee HP et al (2009) Study of materials deformation in nanometric cutting by large-scale molecular dynamics simulations. Nanoscale Res Lett 4:444-451
11. Lucy LB (1977) A numerical approach to the testing of the fission hypothesis. Astron J 82:1013-1024
12. Liu G, Liu M (2003) Smoothed particle hydrodynamics:a meshfree particle method. World Scientific, Singapore
13. Swegle JW, Hicks DL, Attaway SW (1995) Smoothed particle hydrodynamics stability analysis. J Comput Phys 116:123-134
14. Bonet J, Kulasegaram S (2000) Correction and stabilization of smooth particle hydrodynamics methods with applications in metal forming simulations. Int J Numer Meth Eng 47:1189-1214
15. Niu W, Mo R, Chang Z et al (2019) Investigating the effect of cutting parameters of Ti-6Al-4 V on surface roughness based on a SPH cutting model. Appl Sci 9:654
16. Liu MB, Zhang ZL, Feng DL (2017) A density-adaptive SPH method with kernel gradient correction for modeling explosive welding. Comput Mech 60:513-529
17. Vignjevic R, Reveles JR, Campbell J (2006) SPH in a total Lagrangian formalism. Comput Model Eng 4:181-198
18. Ganzenmüller GC (2015) An hourglass control algorithm for Lagrangian smooth particle hydrodynamics. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 286:87-106
19. Limido J, Espinosa C, Salaun M et al (2011) Metal cutting modelling SPH approach. Int J Mach Mach Mater 9:177-196
20. Olleak AA, Nasr MNA, El-Hofy HA (2015) The Influence of Johnson-Cook parameters on SPH modeling of orthogonal cutting of AISI 316L. In:10th European LS-DYNA conference, Würzburg
21. Avachat CS, Cherukuri HP (2015) A parametric study of the modeling of orthogonal machining using the smoothed particle hydrodynamics method. In:ASME 2015 international mechanical engineering congress and exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers
22. Liu Y, Li B, Wu C et al (2018) Smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulation and experimental analysis of SiC ceramic grinding mechanism. Ceram Int 44:12194-12203
23. Demiral M (2014) SPH modeling of vibro-assisted turning of Ti alloy:influence of vibration parameters. J Vibroeng. 16:2685-2694
24. Xi Y, Bermingham M, Wang G et al (2014) SPH/FE modeling of cutting force and chip formation during thermally assisted machining of Ti6Al4V alloy. Comput Mater Sci 84:188-197
25. Rausch MK, Karniadakis GE, Humphrey JD (2017) Modeling soft tissue damage and failure using a combined particle/continuum approach. Biomech Model Mech 16:249-261
26. Islam MRI, Peng C (2019) A Total Lagrangian SPH method for modelling damage and failure in solids. Int J Mech Sci 157:498-511
27. Leroch S, Varga M, Eder SJ et al (2016) Smooth particle hydrodynamics simulation of damage induced by a spherical indenter scratching a viscoplastic material. Int J Solids Struct 81:188-202
28. Varga M, Leroch S, Rojacz H et al (2017) Study of wear mechanisms at high temperature scratch testing. Wear 388:112-118
29. Varga M, Leroch S, Eder SJ et al (2017) Meshless microscale simulation of wear mechanisms in scratch testing. Wear 376:1122-1129
30. Varga M, Leroch S, Eder SJ et al (2019) Influence of velocity on high-temperature fundamental abrasive contact:a numerical and experimental approach. Wear 426:370-371
31. Mishra T, Ganzenmüller GC, de Rooij M et al (2019) Modelling of ploughing in a single-asperity sliding contact using material point method. Wear 418:180-190
32. Bonet J, Kulasegaram S, Rodriguez-Paz MX et al (2004) Variational formulation for the smooth particle hydrodynamics (SPH) simulation of fluid and solid problems. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 193:1245-1256
33. Plimpton S (1995) Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J Comput Phys 117:1-19
34. Desbrun M, Gascuel MP (1996) Smoothed particles:a new paradigm for animating highly deformable bodies. In:Ronan B, Gerard H (eds) Computer animation and simulation'96. Springer, Vienna, pp 61-76
35. Prawoto Y, Fanone M, Shahedi S et al (2012) Computational approach using Johnson-Cook model on dual phase steel. Comput Mater Sci 54:48-55
