[1] Dopker B (1988) Developments in interdisciplinary simulation and design software for mechanical systems. Eng Comput 4:229-238
[2] Walker RA, Shah SC, Gupta NK (1984) Computer-aided engineering (CAE) for system analysis. Proc IEEE 72:1732-1745
[3] Chen Y, Zhang J, Li Z et al (2023) Intelligent methods for optimization design of lightweight fiber-reinforced composite structures: a review and the-state-of-the-art. Front Mater 10:1125328. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2023.1125328
[4] Black N, Najafi AR (2022) Learning finite element convergence with the multi-fidelity graph neural network. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 397:115120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2022.115120
[5] Li YF, Minh HL, Khatir S et al (2023) Structure damage identification in dams using sparse polynomial chaos expansion combined with hybrid K-means clustering optimizer and genetic algorithm. Eng Struct 283:115891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115891
[6] Oishi A, Yagawa G (2021) Finite elements using neural networks and a Posteriori error. Arch Comput Methods Eng 28:3433-3456
[7] Erick RC, Hernan LP, LuisF ZP et al (2017) Process chain for the fabrication of a custom 3D barrier for guided bone regeneration. Procedia CIRP 65:151-156
[8] Gronostajski Z (2000) The constitutive equations for FEM analysis. J Mater Process Technol 106:40-44
[9] Pu B, Song P, Li WB et al (2022) Plastic deformation behavior and constitutive modeling of Cu-50Ta alloy during hot compression. Mater Res Express 9:016517. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ac49bd
[10] Liu X, Gasco F, Goodsell J et al (2019) Initial failure strength prediction of woven composites using a new yarn failure criterion constructed by deep learning. Compos Struct 230:111505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111505
[11] Furukawa T, Yagawa G (1998) Implicit constitutive modelling for viscoplasticity using neural networks. Int J Numer Methods Eng 43:195-219
[12] Shin H, Kim JB (2010) A phenomenological constitutive equation to describe various flow stress behaviors of materials in wide strain rate and temperature regimes. J Eng Mater Technol 132:021009. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4000225
[13] Alexis R, Rodríguez-Martínez JA (2009) Thermo-viscoplastic constitutive relation for aluminium alloys, modeling of negative strain rate sensitivity and viscous drag effects. Mater Des 30:4377-4390
[14] Csáji BC (2001) Approximation with artificial neural networks. Dissertation, Eotvos Lorand University
[15] Liu X, Tian S, Tao F et al (2021) A review of artificial neural networks in the constitutive modeling of composite materials. Compos Part B Eng 224:109152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109152
[16] Feng XT, Yang C (2001) Genetic evolution of nonlinear material constitutive models. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190:5957-5973
[17] Tao F, Liu X, Du H et al (2022) Finite element coupled positive definite deep neural networks mechanics system for constitutive modeling of composites. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 391:114548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2021.114548
[18] Tao F, Liu X, Du H et al (2021) Learning composite constitutive laws via coupling Abaqus and deep neural network. Compos Struct 272:114137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114137
[19] Stoffel M, Bamer F, Markert B (2018) Artificial neural networks and intelligent finite elements in non-linear structural mechanics. Thin-Walled Struct 131:102-106
[20] Stoffel M, Bamer F, Markert B (2019) Neural network based constitutive modeling of nonlinear viscoplastic structural response. Mech Res Commun 95:85-88
[21] Bahtiri B, Arash B, Scheffler S et al (2023) A machine learning-based viscoelastic-viscoplastic model for epoxy nanocomposites with moisture content. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 415:116293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2023.116293
[22] Khorrami MS, Mianroodi JR, Siboni NH et al (2023) An artificial neural network for surrogate modeling of stress fields in viscoplastic polycrystalline materials. Npj Comput Mater 9:37. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-023-00991-z
[23] Liu X, Yan Z, Zhong Z (2021) Predicting elastic modulus of porous La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3?δ cathodes from microstructures via FEM and deep learning. Int J Hydrog Energy 46:22079-22091
[24] Yao H, Gao Y, Liu Y (2020) FEA-Net: a physics-guided data-driven model for efficient mechanical response prediction. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 363:112892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2020.112892
[25] Frankel A, Hamel CM, Bolintineanu D et al (2022) Machine learning constitutive models of elastomeric foams. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 391:114492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2021.114492
[26] Qu T, Di S, Feng YT et al (2021) Towards data-driven constitutive modelling for granular materials via micromechanics-informed deep learning. Int J Plast 144:103046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2021.103046
[27] Sencu RM, Yang Z, Wang YC et al (2016) Generation of micro-scale finite element models from synchrotron X-ray CT images for multidirectional carbon fibre reinforced composites. Compos Part Appl Sci Manuf 91:85-95
[28] Huang W, Causse P, Brailovski V et al (2019) Reconstruction of mesostructural material twin models of engineering textiles based on micro-CT aided geometric modeling. Compos Part Appl Sci Manuf 124:105481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105481
[29] Yang H, Wang W, Li C et al (2022) Deep learning-based X-ray computed tomography image reconstruction and prediction of compression behavior of 3D printed lattice structures. Addit Manuf 54:102774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2022.102774
[30] Sinchuk Y, Shishkina O, Gueguen M et al (2022) X-ray CT based multi-layer unit cell modeling of carbon fiber-reinforced textile composites: segmentation, meshing and elastic property homogenization. Compos Struct 298:116003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116003
[31] Polyzos E, Nikolaou C, Polyzos D et al (2023) Direct modeling of the elastic properties of single 3D printed composite filaments using X-ray computed tomography images segmented by neural networks. Addit Manuf 76:103786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2023.103786
[32] Zheng J, Qian K, Zhang D (2024) Reverse reconstruction of geometry modeling and numerical verification of 2.5D woven composites based on deep learning. Compos Struct 329:117801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117801
[33] Ghane E, Fagerstr?m M, Mirkhalaf SM (2023) A multiscale deep learning model for elastic properties of woven composites. Int J Solids Struct 282:112452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2023.112452
[34] Baker TJ (2005) Mesh generation: art or science? Prog Aerosp Sci 41:29-63
[35] Chawner JR, Taylor NJ (2019) Progress in geometry modeling and mesh generation toward the CFD vision 2030. In: AIAA aviation 2019 forum. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Dallas
[36] Mahmood R, Jimack PK (2004) Locally optimal unstructured finite element meshes in 3 dimensions. Comput Struct 82:2105-2116
[37] Wang N, Lu P, Chang X et al (2021) Preliminary investigation on unstructured mesh generation technique based on advancing front method and machine learning methods. Chin J Theor Appl Mech 53:740-751
[38] Mavriplis DJ (1997) Unstructured grid techniques. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 29:473-514
[39] Thompson JF (1992) The national grid project. Comput Syst Eng 3:393-399
[40] Lei N, Li Z, Xu Z et al (2024) What’s the situation with intelligent mesh generation: a survey and perspectives. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 30:4997-5017
[41] Ahn CH, Lee SS, Lee HJ et al (1991) A self-organizing neural network approach for automatic mesh generation. IEEE Trans Magn 27:4201-4204
[42] Alfonzetti S, Coco S, Cavalieri S et al (1996) Automatic mesh generation by the let-it-grow neural network. IEEE Trans Magn 32:1349-1352
[43] Lu H, Wu Y, Chen S (2003) A new method based on SOM network to generate coarse meshes for overlapping unstructured multigrid algorithm. Appl Math Comput 140:353-360
[44] Yao S, Yan B, Chen B et al (2005) An ANN-based element extraction method for automatic mesh generation. Expert Syst Appl 29:193-206
[45] Alfonzetti S, Dilettoso E, Salerno N (2008) An optimized generator of finite element meshes based on a neural network. IEEE Trans Magn 44:1278-1281
[46] Chen X, Li T, Wan Q et al (2022) MGNet: a novel differential mesh generation method based on unsupervised neural networks. Eng Comput 38:4409-4421
[47] Lu P, Wang N, Lin Y et al (2022) A new unstructured hybrid mesh generation method based on BP-ANN. J Phys Conf Ser 2280:012045. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2280/1/012045
[48] Xu Q, Nie Z, Xu H et al (2022) SuperMeshing: a new deep learning architecture for increasing the mesh density of physical fields in metal forming numerical simulation. J Appl Mech 89:011002. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4052195
[49] Rios T, Sendhoff B, Menzel S et al (2019) On the efficiency of a point cloud autoencoder as a geometric representation for shape optimization. In: 2019 IEEE symposium series on computational intelligence (SSCI), IEEE, Xiamen
[50] Zhang Z, Jimack PK, Wang H (2021) MeshingNet3D: efficient generation of adapted tetrahedral meshes for computational mechanics. Adv Eng Softw 157(158):103021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2021.103021
[51] Xu Z, Chen X, Chi L et al (2020) A mesh quality discrimination method based on convolutional neural network. In: 2020 IEEE international conference on artificial intelligence and computer applications (ICAICA), IEEE, Dalian
[52] Sengupta TK (2013) High accuracy computing methods: fluid flows and wave phenomena. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
[53] Carbonell JM, Monforte L, Ciantia MO et al (2022) Geotechnical particle finite element method for modeling of soil-structure interaction under large deformation conditions. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 14:967-983
[54] Zienkiewicz OC, Taylor RL (2005) The finite element method for solid and structural mechanics, 6th ed. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Amsterdam p 179-214
[55] Yao M, Anandarajah A (2003) Three-dimensional discrete element method of analysis of clays. J Eng Mech 129:585-596
[56] Belytschko T, Lu YY, Gu L (1994) Element-free Galerkin methods. Int J Numer Methods Eng 37:229-256
[57] Boyd JP (2001) Chebyshev and fourier spectral methods. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
[58] Roy AM, Bose R, Sundararaghavan V et al (2023) Deep learning-accelerated computational framework based on physics informed neural network for the solution of linear elasticity. Neural Netw 162:472-489
[59] Karniadakis GE, Kevrekidis IG, Lu L et al (2021) Physics-informed machine learning. Nat Rev Phys 3:422-440
[60] Takeuchi J, Kosugi Y (1994) Neural network representation of finite element method. Neural Netw 7:389-395
[61] Yagawa G, Aoki O (1995) A neural network-based finite element method on parallel processors. In: Batra RC (ed) Contemporary research in engineering science, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Heidelberg
[62] Ghavamian F, Simone A (2019) Accelerating multiscale finite element simulations of history-dependent materials using a recurrent neural network. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 357:112594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2019.112594
[63] Huang Z, Liang S, Zhang H et al (2023) On fast simulation of dynamical system with neural vector enhanced numerical solver. Sci Rep 13:15254. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42194-y
[64] Mianroodi JR, HSiboniRaabe ND (2021) Teaching solid mechanics to artificial intelligence—a fast solver for heterogeneous materials. Npj Comput Mater 7:99. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-021-00571-z
[65] Michoski C, Milosavljevi? M, Oliver T et al (2020) Solving differential equations using deep neural networks. Neurocomputing 399:193-212
[66] Raissi M (2018) Deep hidden physics models: deep learning of nonlinear partial differential equations. J Mach Learn Res 19:1-24
[67] Haghighat E, Raissi M, Moure A et al (2021) A physics-informed deep learning framework for inversion and surrogate modeling in solid mechanics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 379:113741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2021.113741
[68] Lagaris IE, Likas A, Fotiadis DI (1998) Artificial neural networks for solving ordinary and partial differential equations. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 9:987-1000
[69] Raissi M, Karniadakis GE (2018) Hidden physics models: machine learning of nonlinear partial differential equations. J Comput Phys 357:125-141
[70] Jin X, Cai S, Li H et al (2021) NSFnets (Navier-Stokes flow nets): physics-informed neural networks for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. J Comput Phys 426:109951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109951
[71] Sun L, Gao H, Pan S et al (2020) Surrogate modeling for fluid flows based on physics-constrained deep learning without simulation data. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 361:112732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2019.112732
[72] Lou Q, Meng X, Karniadakis GE (2021) Physics-informed neural networks for solving forward and inverse flow problems via the Boltzmann-BGK formulation. J Comput Phys 447:110676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110676
[73] Cai S, Wang Z, Wang S et al (2021) Physics-informed neural networks for heat transfer problems. J Heat Transf 143:060801. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4050542
[74] Shukla K, Jagtap AD, Blackshire JL et al (2022) A physics-informed neural network for quantifying the microstructural properties of polycrystalline nickel using ultrasound data: a promising approach for solving inverse problems. IEEE Signal Process Mag 39:68-77
[75] Jagtap AD, Mao Z, Adams N et al (2022) Physics-informed neural networks for inverse problems in supersonic flows. J Comput Phys 466:111402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111402
[76] Waheed UB, Haghighat E, Alkhalifah T et al (2021) PINNeik: eikonal solution using physics-informed neural networks. Comput Geosci 155:104833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104833
[77] McClenny LD, Braga-Neto UM (2023) Self-adaptive physics-informed neural networks. J Comput Phys 474:111722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111722
[78] De Ryck T, Jagtap AD, Mishra S (2023) Error estimates for physics informed neural networks approximating the Navier-Stokes equations. IMA J Numer Anal 44:83-119
[79] Jagtap AD, Kharazmi E, Karniadakis GE (2020) Conservative physics-informed neural networks on discrete domains for conservation laws: applications to forward and inverse problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 365:113028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2020.113028
[80] Jagtap AD, Karniadakis GEM (2020) Extended physics-informed neural networks (XPINNs): a generalized space-time domain decomposition based deep learning framework for nonlinear partial differential equations. Commun Comput Phys 28:2002-2041
[81] Lu Y, Li H, Zhang L et al (2023) Convolution hierarchical deep-learning neural networks (C-HiDeNN): finite elements, isogeometric analysis, tensor decomposition, and beyond. Comput Mech 72:333-362
[82] Park C, Lu Y, Saha S et al (2023) Convolution hierarchical deep-learning neural network (C-HiDeNN) with graphics processing unit (GPU) acceleration. Comput Mech 72:383-409
[83] Liu Y, Park C, Lu Y et al (2023) HiDeNN-FEM: a seamless machine learning approach to nonlinear finite element analysis. Comput Mech 72:173-194
[84] Du H, He Q (2024) Neural-integrated meshfree (NIM) method: a differentiable programming-based hybrid solver for computational mechanics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 427:117024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2024.117024
[85] Sun J, Liu Y, Wang Y et al (2023) BINN: a deep learning approach for computational mechanics problems based on boundary integral equations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 410:116012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2023.116012
[86] Dong Y, Liu T, Li Z et al (2023) DeepFEM: a novel element-based ceep learning approach for solving nonlinear partial differential equations in computational solid mechanics. J Eng Mech 149:04022102. https://doi.org/10.1061/JENMDT.EMENG-6643
[87] Spruegel T, Rothfelder R, Bickel S et al (2018) Methodology for plausibility checking of structural mechanics simulations using deep learning on existing simulation data. In: Proceedings of NordDesign 2018, Link?ping, Sweden
[88] Bickel S, Goetz S, Wartzack S (2023) Detection of plausibility and error reasons in finite element simulations with deep learning networks. Algorithms 16:209. https://doi.org/10.3390/a16040209
[89] Kiener A, Langer S, Bekemeyer P (2023) Data-driven correction of coarse grid CFD simulations. Comput Fluids 264:105971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2023.105971
[90] Hanna BN, Dinh NT, Youngblood RW et al (2020) Machine-learning based error prediction approach for coarse-grid computational fluid dynamics (CG-CFD). Prog Nucl Energy 118:103140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2019.103140
[91] Rutkowski DR, Roldán-Alzate A, Johnson KM (2021) Enhancement of cerebrovascular 4D flow MRI velocity fields using machine learning and computational fluid dynamics simulation data. Sci Rep 11:10240. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89636-z
[92] Sakong J, Woo SC, Kim TW (2019) Determination of impact fragments from particle analysis via smoothed particle hydrodynamics and k-means clustering. Int J Impact Eng 134:103387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.103387
[93] Morimoto M, Fukami K, Zhang K et al (2021) Convolutional neural networks for fluid flow analysis: toward effective metamodeling and low dimensionalization. Theor Comput Fluid Dyn 35:633-658
[94] Wetlesen D, Siegel S, Cohen K et al (2005) Sensor based proper orthogonal decomposition state estimation in the presence of noise. In: 43rd AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reno
[95] Bhaduri A, Gupta A, Graham-Brady L (2022) Stress field prediction in fiber-reinforced composite materials using a deep learning approach. Compos Part B Eng 238:109879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109879
[96] Ouyang B, Zhu LT, Luo ZH (2022) Machine learning for full spatiotemporal acceleration of gas-particle flow simulations. Powder Technol 408:117701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2022.117701
[97] Umetani N, Bickel B (2018) Learning three-dimensional flow for interactive aerodynamic design. ACM Trans Graph 37:1-10
[98] Wei J, Chu X, Sun X et al (2019) Machine learning in materials science. Info Mat 1:338-358
[99] Wu MY, Yuan XY, Chen ZH et al (2023) Airfoil shape optimization using genetic algorithm coupled deep neural networks. Phys Fluids 35:085140. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0160954
[100] Zhang Z, Zhang Z, Di CF et al (2022) Machine learning for accelerating the design process of double-double composite structures. Compos Struct 285:115233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115233
[101] Rezasefat M, Hogan JD (2023) A finite element-convolutional neural network model (FE-CNN) for stress field analysis around arbitrary inclusions. Mach Learn Sci Technol 4:045052. https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-2153/ad134a
[102] Luo L, Zhang B, Zhang G et al (2020) Rapid prediction of cured shape types of composite laminates using an FEM-ANN method. Compos Struct 238:111980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.111980
[103] Wang Q, Yang L, Rao Y (2021) Establishment of a generalizable model on a small-scale dataset to predict the surface pressure distribution of gas turbine blades. Energy 214:118878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118878
[104] Kobeissi H, Mohammadzadeh S, Lejeune E (2022) Enhancing mechanical metamodels with a generative model-based augmented training dataset. J Biomech Eng 144:121002. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4054898
[105] Wang Y, Liu T, Zhang D et al (2021) Dual-convolutional neural network based aerodynamic prediction and multi-objective optimization of a compact turbine rotor. Aerosp Sci Technol 116:106869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2021.106869
[106] Du P, Zhu X, Wang JX (2022) Deep learning-based surrogate model for three-dimensional patient-specific computational fluid dynamics. Phys Fluids 34:081906. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0101128
[107] Tao J, Sun G, Guo L et al (2020) Application of a PCA-DBN-based surrogate model to robust aerodynamic design optimization. Chin J Aeronaut 33:1573-1588
[108] Qin L, Liu S, Long T et al (2018) Wind field reconstruction using dimension-reduction of CFD data with experimental validation. Energy 151:272-288
[109] Zandsalimy M, Ollivier-Gooch C (2024) Residual vector and solution mode analysis using semi-supervised machine learning for mesh modification and CFD stability improvement. J Comput Phys 510:113063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2024.113063
[110] Huang W, Wang R, Zhang M et al (2024) The research on deep learning-driven dimensionality reduction and strain prediction techniques based on flight parameter data. Appl Sci 14:3938. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14093938
[111] Guo X, Li W, Iorio F (2016) Convolutional neural networks for steady flow approximation. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, ACM, San Francisco
[112] Guastoni L, Güemes A, Ianiro A et al (2021) Convolutional-network models to predict wall-bounded turbulence from wall quantities. J Fluid Mech 928:A27. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2021.812
[113] Wang Z, Xiao D, Fang F et al (2018) Model identification of reduced order fluid dynamics systems using deep learning. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 86:255-268
[114] Dinesh A, Rahul Prasad B (2024) Predictive models in machine learning for strength and life cycle assessment of concrete structures. Autom Constr 162:105412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2024.105412
[115] Montáns FJ, Cueto E, Bathe KJ (2023) Machine learning in computer aided engineering. In: Rabczuk T, Bathe KJ (eds) Machine learning in modeling and simulation: methods and applications, Springer International Publishing, Cham
