A maintenance driven scheduling cockpit for integrated production and maintenance operation schedule

doi:10.1007/s40436-021-00380-z

摘要/Abstract

摘要： The production and maintenance functions have objectives that are often in contrast and it is essential for management to ensure that their activities are carried out synergistically, to ensure the maximum efficiency of the production plant as well as the minimization of management costs. The current evolution of ICT technologies and maintenance strategies in the industrial field is making possible a greater integration between production and maintenance. This work addresses this challenge by combining the knowledge of the data collected from physical assets for predictive maintenance management with the possibility of dynamic simulate the future behaviour of the manufacturing system through a digital twin for optimal management of maintenance interventions. The paper, indeed, presents a supporting digital cockpit for production and maintenance integrated scheduling. The tool proposes an innovative approach to manage health data from machines being in any production system and provides support to compare the information about their remaining useful life (RUL) with the respective production schedule. The maintenance driven scheduling cockpit (MDSC) offers, indeed, a supporting decision tool for the maintenance strategy to be implemented that can help production and maintenance managers in the optimal scheduling of preventive maintenance interventions based on RUL estimation. The simulation is performed by varying the production schedule with the maintenance tasks involvement; opportune decisions are taken evaluating the total costs related to the simulated strategy and the impact on the production schedule.

The full text can be downloaded at https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40436-021-00380-z

关键词: Industry 4.0, Maintenance task, Production schedule, Predictive maintenance, Integrated plan

Abstract: The production and maintenance functions have objectives that are often in contrast and it is essential for management to ensure that their activities are carried out synergistically, to ensure the maximum efficiency of the production plant as well as the minimization of management costs. The current evolution of ICT technologies and maintenance strategies in the industrial field is making possible a greater integration between production and maintenance. This work addresses this challenge by combining the knowledge of the data collected from physical assets for predictive maintenance management with the possibility of dynamic simulate the future behaviour of the manufacturing system through a digital twin for optimal management of maintenance interventions. The paper, indeed, presents a supporting digital cockpit for production and maintenance integrated scheduling. The tool proposes an innovative approach to manage health data from machines being in any production system and provides support to compare the information about their remaining useful life (RUL) with the respective production schedule. The maintenance driven scheduling cockpit (MDSC) offers, indeed, a supporting decision tool for the maintenance strategy to be implemented that can help production and maintenance managers in the optimal scheduling of preventive maintenance interventions based on RUL estimation. The simulation is performed by varying the production schedule with the maintenance tasks involvement; opportune decisions are taken evaluating the total costs related to the simulated strategy and the impact on the production schedule.

The full text can be downloaded at https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40436-021-00380-z

Key words: Industry 4.0, Maintenance task, Production schedule, Predictive maintenance, Integrated plan

Mario Arena, Valentina Di Pasquale, Raffaele Iannone, Salvatore Miranda, Stefano Riemma. A maintenance driven scheduling cockpit for integrated production and maintenance operation schedule[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2022, 10(2): 205-219.

参考文献

1. Ladj A, Varnier C, Tayeb FBS (2016) IPro-GA: an integrated prognostic based GA for scheduling jobs and predictive maintenance in a single multifunctional machine. IFAC-PapersOnLine 49(12):1821–1826
2. Mokhtari H, Mozdgir A, Kamal Abadi IN (2012) A reliability/availability approach to joint production and maintenance scheduling with multiple preventive maintenance services. Int J Prod Res 50(20):5906–5925
3. von Hoyningen-Huene W, Kiesmüller GP (2015) Maintenance and production scheduling on a single machine with stochastic failures. Dissertation, Keele University
4. Boufellouh R, Belkaid F (2020) Bi-objective optimization algorithms for joint production and maintenance scheduling under a global resource constraint: application to the permutation flow shop problem. Comput Oper Res 122:104943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2020.104943
5. Salmasnia A, Mirabadi-Dastjerd D (2017) Joint production and preventive maintenance scheduling for a single degraded machine by considering machine failures. TOP 25:544–578
6. Pan E, Liao W, Xi L (2010) Single-machine-based production scheduling model integrated preventive maintenance planning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 50:365–375
7. Aghezzaf EH, Jamali MA, Ait-Kadi D (2007) An integrated production and preventive maintenance planning model. Eur J Oper Res 181(2):679–685
8. Sbihi M, Varnier C (2008) Single-machine scheduling with periodic and flexible periodic maintenance to minimize maximum tardiness. Comput Ind Eng 55(4):830–840
9. Cassady CR, Kutanoglu E (2003) Minimizing job tardiness using integrated preventive maintenance planning and production scheduling. IIE Trans 35(6):503–513
10. Zied H, Sofiene D, Nidhal R (2011) Optimal integrated maintenance/production policy for randomly failing systems with variable failure rate. Int J Prod Res 49(19):5695–5712
11. Xiao L, Song S, Chen X et al (2016) Joint optimization of production scheduling and machine group preventive maintenance. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 146:68–78
12. Liu Q, Dong M, Chen FF (2018) Single-machine-based joint optimization of predictive maintenance planning and production scheduling. Robot Comput Integr Man 51:238–247
13. Pan E, Liao W, Xi L (2012) A joint model of production scheduling and predictive maintenance for minimizing job tardiness. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 60:1049–1061
14. Liao W, Pan E, Xi L (2007) Dynamic preventive maintenance policy based on health index. In: The proceedings of 2007 international conference on industrial engineering and engineering management. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=4419328
15. Ruiz-Sarmiento JR, Monroy J, Moreno FA et al (2020) A predictive model for the maintenance of industrial machinery in the context of industry 4.0. Eng Appl Artif Intell 87: 103289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2019.103289
16. Ferreiro S, Konde E, Fernández S et al (2016) Industry 4.0: predictive intelligent maintenance for production equipment. In: PHM society European conference, vol 3, no 1. https://doi.org/10.36001/phme.2016.v3i1.1667
17. Efthymiou K, Papakostas N, Mourtzis D et al (2012) On a predictive maintenance platform for production systems. Proced CIRP 3:221–226
18. Nguyen KT, Medjaher K (2019) A new dynamic predictive maintenance framework using deep learning for failure prognostics. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 188:251–262
19. Diez-Olivan A, Del Ser J, Galar D et al (2019) Data fusion and machine learning for industrial prognosis: trends and perspectives towards Industry 4.0. Inf Fusion 50:92–111
20. Romero-Silva R, Santos J, Hurtado M (2015) A framework for studying practical production scheduling. Prod Plan Control 26:438–450
21. Nzukam C, Voisin A, Levrat E et al (2018) Opportunistic maintenance scheduling with stochastic opportunities duration in a predictive maintenance strategy. IFAC-PapersOnLine 51(11):453–458
22. Li Z, Wang Y, Wang KS (2017) Intelligent predictive maintenance for fault diagnosis and prognosis in machine centers: industry 4.0 scenario. Adv Manuf 5(4):377–387
23. Chiarini A, Belvedere V, Grando A (2020) Industry 4.0 strategies and technological developments. An exploratory research from Italian manufacturing companies. Prod Plan Control 31(16):1385–1398
24. Melesse TY, Di Pasquale V, Riemma S (2020) Digital twin models in industrial operations: a systematic literature review. Proced Manuf 42:267–272
25. Aivaliotis P, Georgoulias K, Arkouli Z et al (2019) Methodology for enabling digital twin using advanced physics-based modelling in predictive maintenance. Proced CIRP 81:417–422
26. Liu Z, Meyendorf N, Mrad N (2018) The role of data fusion in predictive maintenance using digital twin. In: AIP conference proceedings, vol 1949, no 1. AIP Publishing LLC, p 020023
27. Rødseth H, Schjølberg P, Marhaug A (2017) Deep digital maintenance. Adv Manuf 5(4):299–310
28. Lee J, Bagheri B, Kao HA (2015) A cyber-physical systems architecture for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manuf Lett 3:18–23
29. Archetti F, Arosio G, Candelieri A et al (2014) Smart data driven maintenance: improving damage detection and assessment on aerospace structures. In: 2014 IEEE metrology for aerospace (MetroAeroSpace), IEEE, pp 101–106
30. Witten IH, Frank E (2002) Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques with Java implementations. ACM SIGMOD Rec 31:76–77
31. Palmer R (2013) Maintenance planning and scheduling handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York
32. Li N, Lei Y, Guo L et al (2017) Remaining useful life prediction based on a general expression of stochastic process models. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 64:5709–5718. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2017.2677334
33. Le Son K, Fouladirad M, Barros A et al (2013) Remaining useful life estimation based on stochastic deterioration models: a comparative study. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 112:165–175
34. Elattar HM, Elminir HK, Riad AM (2016) Prognostics: a literature review. Complex Intell Syst 2(2):125–154

[1]	Y. K. Liu, S. K. Ong, A. Y. C. Nee. State-of-the-art survey on digital twin implementations[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2022, 10(1): 1-23.
[2]	Bin He, Kai-Jian Bai. Digital twin-based sustainable intelligent manufacturing: a review[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2021, 9(1): 1-21.
[3]	Harald Rødseth, Per Schjølberg, Andreas Marhaug. Deep digital maintenance[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2017, 5(4): 299-310.
[4]	Yi Wang, Hai-Shu Ma, Jing-Hui Yang, Ke-Sheng Wang. Industry 4.0: a way from mass customization to mass personalization production[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2017, 5(4): 311-320.
[5]	C. K. M. Lee, S. Z. Zhang, K. K. H. Ng. Development of an industrial Internet of things suite for smart factory towards re-industrialization[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2017, 5(4): 335-343.
[6]	Jo Wessel Strandhagen, Erlend Alfnes, Jan Ola Strandhagen, Logan Reed Vallandingham. The fit of Industry 4.0 applications in manufacturing logistics: a multiple case study[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2017, 5(4): 344-358.
[7]	Jan Ola Strandhagen, Logan Reed Vallandingham, Giuseppe Fragapane, Jo Wessel Strandhagen, Aili Biriita Hætta Stangeland, Nakul Sharma. Logistics 4.0 and emerging sustainable business models[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2017, 5(4): 359-369.
[8]	Zhe Li, Yi Wang, Ke-Sheng Wang. Intelligent predictive maintenance for fault diagnosis and prognosis in machine centers: Industry 4.0 scenario[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2017, 5(4): 377-387.
[9]	Wladimir Bodrow. Impact of Industry 4.0 in service oriented firm[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2017, 5(4): 394-400.
[10]	Ke-Sheng Wang, Zhe Li, Jørgen Braaten, Quan Yu. Interpretation and compensation of backlash error data in machine centers for intelligent predictive maintenance using ANNs[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2015, 3(2): 97-104.
[11]	Harald Rødseth, Terje Skarlo, Per Schjølberg. Profit loss indicator: a novel maintenance indicator applied for integrated planning[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2015, 3(2): 139-150.