Process planning and contour-based error compensation for precision grinding of miniature scalpels

doi:10.1007/s40436-023-00458-w

Advances in Manufacturing ›› 2024, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (1): 108-123.doi: 10.1007/s40436-023-00458-w

• • 上一篇

Process planning and contour-based error compensation for precision grinding of miniature scalpels

Cheng Fan¹, Cao-Yang Xue², Jun Zhao³, Wei Jiang¹, Wen-Ge Han¹, Lei Zhang¹, Li-Ning Sun¹

1. Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Advanced Robotics, School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Soochow University, Suzhou, 215021, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China;
2. Key Laboratory of Fluid Power and Mechatronic Systems, School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310027, People's Republic of China;
3. State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Equipment and Manufacturing, School of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, 310023, People's Republic of China

收稿日期:2023-02-26 修回日期:2023-04-25 发布日期:2024-03-14
通讯作者: Lei Zhang,E-mail:sudazhanglei@suda.edu.cn E-mail:sudazhanglei@suda.edu.cn
作者简介:Cheng Fan is an associate professor at the School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Soochow University. He received his Ph.D. from the School of Mechanical Science and Engineering of Jilin University. His research interests include precision manufacturing and adaptively controlled polishing. He has published more than 50 papers and obtained more than 10 national invention patents;
Cao-Yang Xue is a doctoral student at the School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Zhejiang University. His research interests include grinding of miniature scalpels and error compensation;
Jun Zhao is an associate professor at the School of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology. He received his Ph.D. from the School of Mechanical Science and Engineering of Jilin University. His research interests include intelligent and precision manufacturing;
Wei Jiang is currently studying at the School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Soochow University, and is majoring in precision grinding and equipment development;
Wen-Ge Han is postgraduate student at the School of Mechanical Engineering of Soochow University and is mainly engaged in intelligent precision manufacturing;
Lei Zhang is a Professor at the School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Soochow University, Soochow, Jiangsu Province, China. He received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Jilin University of Technology, China, in 1999. His research interests include grinding and polishing of freeform surfaces;
Li-Ning Sun is primarily engaged in research on the structure and control of nanoscale microdrive and micromanipulation robots as well as industrial, medical, and educational robots. He is the winner of the National Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars and a distinguished professor of Changjiang Scholars at the Ministry of Education. He is an expert in the overall group of the key science and technology special project for service robots at the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China. He has published more than 200 papers and obtained more than 20 national invention patents.
基金资助:
This research was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2021YFB3400300), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51975392). We thank Beijing Bohai Kangyuan Medical Instrument Co., Ltd. for providing the blank scalpels used in this study.

Process planning and contour-based error compensation for precision grinding of miniature scalpels

Cheng Fan¹, Cao-Yang Xue², Jun Zhao³, Wei Jiang¹, Wen-Ge Han¹, Lei Zhang¹, Li-Ning Sun¹

1. Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Advanced Robotics, School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Soochow University, Suzhou, 215021, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China;
2. Key Laboratory of Fluid Power and Mechatronic Systems, School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310027, People's Republic of China;
3. State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Equipment and Manufacturing, School of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, 310023, People's Republic of China

Received:2023-02-26 Revised:2023-04-25 Published:2024-03-14
Contact: Lei Zhang,E-mail:sudazhanglei@suda.edu.cn E-mail:sudazhanglei@suda.edu.cn
Supported by:
This research was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2021YFB3400300), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51975392). We thank Beijing Bohai Kangyuan Medical Instrument Co., Ltd. for providing the blank scalpels used in this study.

摘要/Abstract

摘要： Miniature scalpels are mainly used in microsurgeries such as ophthalmic and cardiovascular surgeries. The size of a miniature scalpel is only a few millimeters, and the precision of the blade shape is high, which makes production of miniature scalpels extremely difficult. This study proposes a new sharpening process for grinding miniature scalpels on a four-axis machine tool. A post-processing algorithm for a four-axis grinding machine based on a kinematics model is established. We then propose a corresponding parameter calibration method for the parameters used in the kinematics model. Because of possible errors in the parameter calibration, a contour-based error compensation method is proposed for accurate adjustments to the edge shape following grinding. This can solve the problem of large deviations between the actual edge shape after grinding and the ideal edge shape. The effectiveness of the proposed process planning and error compensation method is verified experimentally, and the grinding process parameters of the miniature scalpel are optimized to improve its surface processing quality. The sharpness of the optimized miniature scalpel is less than 0.75 N, and the blade shape is symmetrical, which meets the technical requirements of miniature scalpels.

The full text can be downloaded at https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40436-023-00458-w

关键词: Miniature scalpel, Sharpening, Kinematics, Error compensation, Grinding

Abstract: Miniature scalpels are mainly used in microsurgeries such as ophthalmic and cardiovascular surgeries. The size of a miniature scalpel is only a few millimeters, and the precision of the blade shape is high, which makes production of miniature scalpels extremely difficult. This study proposes a new sharpening process for grinding miniature scalpels on a four-axis machine tool. A post-processing algorithm for a four-axis grinding machine based on a kinematics model is established. We then propose a corresponding parameter calibration method for the parameters used in the kinematics model. Because of possible errors in the parameter calibration, a contour-based error compensation method is proposed for accurate adjustments to the edge shape following grinding. This can solve the problem of large deviations between the actual edge shape after grinding and the ideal edge shape. The effectiveness of the proposed process planning and error compensation method is verified experimentally, and the grinding process parameters of the miniature scalpel are optimized to improve its surface processing quality. The sharpness of the optimized miniature scalpel is less than 0.75 N, and the blade shape is symmetrical, which meets the technical requirements of miniature scalpels.

The full text can be downloaded at https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40436-023-00458-w

Key words: Miniature scalpel, Sharpening, Kinematics, Error compensation, Grinding

Cheng Fan, Cao-Yang Xue, Jun Zhao, Wei Jiang, Wen-Ge Han, Lei Zhang, Li-Ning Sun. Process planning and contour-based error compensation for precision grinding of miniature scalpels[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2024, 12(1): 108-123.

参考文献

1 Dundar R, Iynen I, Buyruk A (2021) Different approach for surgery of stapes: comparison microscopic and endoscopic approach. Am J Otolaryngol 43(4):103242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.103242
2 Marsh DJ, Fox A, Grobbelaar AO et al (2015) Abdominoplasty and seroma: a prospective randomised study comparing scalpel and handheld electrocautery dissection. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 68(2):192–196
3 Milling R, Carolan D, Pafitanis G et al (2022) Microtools: a systematic review of validated assessment tools in microsurgery. J Plast Reconstruct Aesthet Surg 75(11):4013–4022
4 Sabin LE (2010) From fingers to miniaturization and robots: an overview of the history of surgical instrumentation. Perioper Nurs Clin 5(1):1–13
5 Fan C, Liu K, Wang Y et al (2023) Nano-indentation and nano-scratch of flexible intraocular lens material at the molecular scale. Acta Mech Sin 39(1):122331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-022-22321-x
6 Fan C, Liu K, Chen Y et al (2022) A new modelling method of material removal profile for electrorheological polishing with a mini annular integrated electrode. J Mater Process Technol 305:117589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.117589
7 Lu J, Wang X, Huang Y et al (2020) Fabrication and cutting performance of bionic micro-serrated scalpels based on the miscanthus leaves. Tribol Int 145:106162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2020.106162
8 McCarthy CT, Hussey M, Gilchrist MD (2007) On the sharpness of straight edge blades in cutting soft solids: part I—indentation experiments. Eng Fract Mech 74(14):2205–2224
9 Stępień P (2010) Micro-geometrical characteristics of the cutting edge as the intersection of two rough surfaces. Wear 269(3/4):249–261
10 Reilly GA, McCormack BAO, Taylor D (2004) Cutting sharpness measurement: a critical review. J Mater Process Technol 153:261–267
11 Belkin PN, Kusmanov SA, Parfenov EV (2020) Mechanism and technological opportunity of plasma electrolytic polishing of metals and alloys surfaces. Appl Surf Sci Adv 1:100016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsadv.2020.100016
12 Prescher H, Ling MX, Bigdelle V et al (2021) Scalpel edge roughness affects post-transection peripheral nerve regeneration. Surg Open Sci 4:1–6
13 Schwenke H, Knapp W, Haitjema H et al (2008) Geometric error measurement and compensation of machines—an update. CIRP Ann 57(2):660–675
14 Eastwood S, Webb P (2009) Compensation of thermal deformation of a hybrid parallel kinematic machine. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 25(1):81–90
15 Luo G, Zou L, Wang Z et al (2021) A novel kinematic parameters calibration method for industrial robot based on Levenberg-Marquardt and differential evolution hybrid algorithm. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 71:102165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2021.102165
16 Xia C, Wang S, Ma C et al (2020) Crucial geometric error compensation toward gear grinding accuracy enhancement based on simplified actual inverse kinematic model. Int J Mech Sci 169:105319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.105319
17 Ramesh R, Mannan MA, Poo AN (2000) Error compensation in machine tools—a review: part I: geometric, cutting-force induced and fixture-dependent errors. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 40(9):1235–1256
18 Zhu S, Ding G, Qin S et al (2012) Integrated geometric error modeling, identification and compensation of CNC machine tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 52(1):24–29
19 Xia H, Peng W, Ouyang X et al (2017) Identification of geometric errors of rotary axis on multi-axis machine tool based on kinematic analysis method using double ball bar. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 122:161–175
20 Ibaraki S, Iritani T, Matsushita T (2012) Calibration of location errors of rotary axes on five-axis machine tools by on-the-machine measurement using a touch-trigger probe. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 58(1):44–53
21 Wan A, Song L, Xu J et al (2018) Calibration and compensation of machine tool volumetric error using a laser tracker. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 124:126–133
22 Wei X, Miao E, Wang W et al (2019) Real-time thermal deformation compensation method for active phased array antenna panels. Precis Eng 60:121–129
23 Zhang T, Ye W, Shan Y (2016) Application of sliced inverse regression with fuzzy clustering for thermal error modeling of CNC machine tool. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 85(9):2761–2771
24 Fu G, Tao C, Xie Y et al (2021) Temperature-sensitive point selection for thermal error modeling of machine tool spindle by considering heat source regions. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 112(9):2447–2460
25 Wei X, Feng X, Miao E et al (2022) Sub-regional thermal error compensation modeling for CNC machine tool worktables. Precis Eng 73:313–325

[1]	Zi-Shan Ding, Yun-Hui Zhao, Miao-Xian Guo, Wei-Cheng Guo, Chong-Jun Wu, Steven Y. Liang. An iterative blending integrating grinding force model considering grain size and dislocation density evolution[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2023, 11(3): 428-443.
[2]	Ben-Kai Li, Biao Zhao, Wen-Feng Ding, Yu-Can Fu, Chang-He Li, Rong Wang, Yan-Jun Zhao. CBN grain wear and its effects on material removal during grinding of FGH96 powder metallurgy superalloy[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2023, 11(1): 21-38.
[3]	Long-Xu Yao, Zhan-Qiang Liu, Qing-Hua Song, Bing Wang, Yu-Kui Cai. Effects of process parameters on periodic impact force exerting on cutting tool in ultrasonic vibration-assisted oblique turning[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2022, 10(3): 411-427.
[4]	Bing Cao, Guo-Long Li, Alessandro Fortunato, Heng-Xin Ni. Continuous generating grinding method for beveloid gears and analysis of grinding characteristics[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2022, 10(3): 459-478.
[5]	Ming-Hui Fang, Tao Yu, Feng-Feng Xi. Effect of back pressure on the grinding performance of abrasive suspension flow machining[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2022, 10(1): 143-157.
[6]	Roshan Lal Virdi, Sukhpal Singh Chatha, Hazoor Singh. Performance evaluation of nanofluid-based minimum quantity lubrication grinding of Ni-Cr alloy under the influence of CuO nanoparticles[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2021, 9(4): 580-591.
[7]	Xiang-Long Zhu, Yu Li, Zhi-Gang Dong, Ren-Ke Kang, Shang Gao. Study into grinding force in back grinding of wafer with outer rim[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2020, 8(3): 361-368.
[8]	Ben-Kai Li, Qing Miao, Min Li, Xi Zhang, Wen-Feng Ding. An investigation on machined surface quality and tool wear during creep feed grinding of powder metallurgy nickel-based superalloy FGH96 with alumina abrasive wheels[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2020, 8(2): 160-176.
[9]	Ping Zhou, Zi-Guang Wang, Ying Yan, Ning Huang, Ren-Ke Kang, Dong-Ming Guo. Sensitivity analysis of the surface integrity of monocrystalline silicon to grinding speed with same grain depth-of-cut[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2020, 8(1): 97-106.
[10]	Xiao-Liang Shi, Shi-Chao Xiu, Hui-Ling Su. Residual stress model of pre-stressed dry grinding considering coupling of thermal, stress, and phase transformation[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2019, 7(4): 401-410.
[11]	Shi-Jie Dai, Xiao-Qiang Li, Hui-Bo Zhang. Research on temperature field of non-uniform heat source model in surface grinding by cup wheel[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2019, 7(3): 326-342.
[12]	Pin Li, Jun-Tong Xi. Modeling of laser adjustment for large diameter tubes using robotic kinematic theories[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2018, 6(4): 401-408.
[13]	V. G. Ladeesh, R. Manu. Effect of machining parameters on edge-chipping during drilling of glass using grinding-aided electrochemical discharge machining (G-ECDM)[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2018, 6(2): 215-224.
[14]	Zi-Li Xu, Song Lu, Jun Yang, Yong-Hui Feng, Chun-Tai Shen. A wheel-type in-pipe robot for grinding weld beads[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2017, 5(2): 182-190.
[15]	Bahman Azarhoushang, Ali Zahedi. Laser conditioning and structuring of grinding tools-a review[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2017, 5(1): 35-49.

Process planning and contour-based error compensation for precision grinding of miniature scalpels

Process planning and contour-based error compensation for precision grinding of miniature scalpels

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价