Multi-verse optimizer based parameters decision with considering tool life in dry hobbing process

doi:10.1007/s40436-021-00349-y

Advances in Manufacturing ›› 2021, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (2): 216-234.doi: 10.1007/s40436-021-00349-y

Multi-verse optimizer based parameters decision with considering tool life in dry hobbing process

Heng-Xin Ni¹, Chun-Ping Yan¹, Shen-Fu Ni², Huan Shu¹, Yu Zhang¹

1 State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Transmission, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, People's Republic of China;
2 Hefei Meiya Photoelectric Technology Co. Ltd, Hefei 230088, People's Republic of China

收稿日期:2020-10-11 修回日期:2020-11-20 出版日期:2021-06-25 发布日期:2021-05-24
通讯作者: Chun-Ping Yan E-mail:ycp@cqu.edu.cn
基金资助:
This work was supported by the Key Projects of Strategic Scientific and Technological Innovation Cooperation of National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2020YFE0201000).

Multi-verse optimizer based parameters decision with considering tool life in dry hobbing process

Heng-Xin Ni¹, Chun-Ping Yan¹, Shen-Fu Ni², Huan Shu¹, Yu Zhang¹

1 State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Transmission, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, People's Republic of China;
2 Hefei Meiya Photoelectric Technology Co. Ltd, Hefei 230088, People's Republic of China

Received:2020-10-11 Revised:2020-11-20 Online:2021-06-25 Published:2021-05-24
Contact: Chun-Ping Yan E-mail:ycp@cqu.edu.cn
Supported by:
This work was supported by the Key Projects of Strategic Scientific and Technological Innovation Cooperation of National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2020YFE0201000).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： Dry hobbing has received extensive attention for its environmentally friendly processing pattern. Due to the absence of lubricants, hobbing process is highly dependent on process parameters combination since using unreasonable parameters tends to affect the machining performance. Besides, the consideration of tool life is frequently ignored in gear hobbing. Thus, to settle the above issues, a multi-objective parameters decision approach considering tool life is developed. Firstly, detailed quantitative analysis between process parameters and hobbing performance, i.e., machining time, production cost and tool life is introduced. Secondly, a multi-objective parameters decision-making model is constructed in search for optimum cutting parameters (cutting velocity v, axial feed rate f_a) and hob parameters (hob diameter d₀, threads z₀). Thirdly, a novel algorithm named multi-objective multi-verse optimizer (MOMVO) is utilized to solve the presented model. A case study is exhibited to show the feasibility and reliability of the proposed approach. The results reveal that (i) a balance can be achieved among machining time, production cost and tool life via appropriate process parameters determination; (ii) optimizing cutting parameters and hob parameters simultaneously contributes to optimal objectives; (iii) considering tool life provides usage precautions support and process parameters guidance for practical machining.

The full text can be downloaded at https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40436-021-00349-y

关键词: Process parameters, Decision-making, Tool life, Dry hobbing, Multi-objective multi-verse optimizer (MOMVO)

Abstract: Dry hobbing has received extensive attention for its environmentally friendly processing pattern. Due to the absence of lubricants, hobbing process is highly dependent on process parameters combination since using unreasonable parameters tends to affect the machining performance. Besides, the consideration of tool life is frequently ignored in gear hobbing. Thus, to settle the above issues, a multi-objective parameters decision approach considering tool life is developed. Firstly, detailed quantitative analysis between process parameters and hobbing performance, i.e., machining time, production cost and tool life is introduced. Secondly, a multi-objective parameters decision-making model is constructed in search for optimum cutting parameters (cutting velocity v, axial feed rate f_a) and hob parameters (hob diameter d₀, threads z₀). Thirdly, a novel algorithm named multi-objective multi-verse optimizer (MOMVO) is utilized to solve the presented model. A case study is exhibited to show the feasibility and reliability of the proposed approach. The results reveal that (i) a balance can be achieved among machining time, production cost and tool life via appropriate process parameters determination; (ii) optimizing cutting parameters and hob parameters simultaneously contributes to optimal objectives; (iii) considering tool life provides usage precautions support and process parameters guidance for practical machining.

The full text can be downloaded at https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40436-021-00349-y

Key words: Process parameters, Decision-making, Tool life, Dry hobbing, Multi-objective multi-verse optimizer (MOMVO)

Heng-Xin Ni, Chun-Ping Yan, Shen-Fu Ni, Huan Shu, Yu Zhang. Multi-verse optimizer based parameters decision with considering tool life in dry hobbing process[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2021, 9(2): 216-234.

参考文献

1. Tu G, Wu S, Liu J et al (2016) Cutting performance and wear mechanisms of Sialon ceramic cutting tools at high speed dry turning of gray cast iron. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater 54:330-334
2. Li L, Deng X, Zhao J et al (2018) Multi-objective optimization of tool path considering efficiency energy-saving and carbon-emission for free-form surface milling. J Clean Prod 172:3311-3322
3. Lin W, Yu DY, Wang S et al (2015) Multi-objective teachinglearning-based optimization algorithm for reducing carbon emissions and operation time in turning operations. Eng Optim 47:994-1007
4. Wang W, Tian G, Chen M et al (2020) Dual-objective program and improved artificial bee colony for the optimization of energyconscious milling parameters subject to multiple constraints. J Clean Prod 245:118714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118714
5. Gui F, Ren S, Zhao Y et al (2019) Activity-based allocation and optimization for carbon footprint and cost in product lifecycle. J Clean Prod 36:117627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117627
6. Claudin C, Rech J (2009) Development of a new rapid characterization method of hob's wear resistance in gear manufacturing:application to the evaluation of various cutting edge preparations in high speed dry gear hobbing. J Mater Process Technol 209(11):5152-5160
7. Karpuschewski B, Beutner M, Köchig M et al (2017) Cemented carbide tools in high speed gear hobbing applications. CIRP Ann 66:117-120
8. El-Mounayri H, Deng H (2010) A generic and innovative approach for integrated simulation and optimisation of end milling using solid modelling and neural network. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 23:40-60
9. Ma H, Liu W, Zhou X et al (2020) An effective and automatic approach for parameters optimization of complex end milling process based on virtual machining. J Intell Manuf 31:967-984
10. Tian C, Zhou G, Zhang J et al (2019) Optimization of cutting parameters considering tool wear conditions in low-carbon manufacturing environment. J Clean Prod 226:706-719
11. Chen X, Li C, Tang Y et al (2019) Integrated optimization of cutting tool and cutting parameters in face milling for minimizing energy footprint and production time. Energy 175:1021-1037
12. Kuntoğlu M, Sağlam H (2019) Investigation of progressive tool wear for determining of optimized machining parameters in turning. Measurement 140:427-436
13. Mia M, Dey PR, Hossain MS et al (2018) Taguchi based optimization of machining parameters for surface roughness, tool wear and material removal rate in hard turning under MQL cutting condition. Measurement 122:380-391
14. Petrović M, Mitić M, Vuković N et al (2016) Chaotic particle swarm optimization algorithm for flexible process planning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 85:2535-2555
15. Karpuschewski B, Beutner M, Köchig M et al (2017) Influence of the tool profile on the wear behaviour in gear hobbing. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 18:128-134
16. Brecher C, Brumm M, Krömer M (2015) Design of gear hobbing processes using simulations and empirical data. Procedia CIRP 33:484-489
17. Klocke F, Döbbeler B, Goetz S et al (2016) Online tool wear measurement for hobbing of highly loaded gears in Geared Turbo Fans. Procedia Manuf 6:9-16
18. Sari D, Troß N, Löpenhaus C et al (2019) Development of an application-oriented tool life equation for dry gear finish hobbing. Wear 426-427(Part B):1563-1572
19. Zhou G, Lu Q, Xiao Z et al (2019) Cutting parameter optimization for machining operations considering carbon emissions. J Clean Prod 208:937-950
20. Mia M, Rifat A, Tanvir MF et al (2018) Multi-objective optimization of chip-tool interaction parameters using Grey-Taguchi method in MQL-assisted turning. Measurement 129:156-166
21. Kumar R, Hynes NRJ, Pruncu CI et al (2019) Multi-objective optimization of green technology thermal drilling process using grey-fuzzy logic method. J Clean Prod 236:117711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117711
22. Deng Z, Zhang H, Fu Y et al (2017) Optimization of process parameters for minimum energy consumption based on cutting specific energy consumption. J Clean Prod 166:1407-1414
23. Rana P, Lalwani DI (2017) Parameters optimization of surface grinding process using modified e constrained differential evolution. Mater Today Proc 4(9):10104-10108
24. Deng Z, Lv L, Li S et al (2016) Study on the model of high efficiency and low carbon for grinding parameters optimization and its application. J Clean Prod 137:1672-1681
25. Zhang F, Zhou T (2019) Process parameter optimization for laser-magnetic welding based on a sample-sorted support vector regression. J Intell Manuf 30:2217-2230
26. Kitayama S, Yamazaki Y, Takano M et al (2018) Numerical and experimental investigation of process parameters optimization in plastic injection molding using multi-criteria decision making. Simul Model Pract Theory 85:95-105
27. Umer U, Mohammed MK, Al-Ahmari A (2017) Multi-response optimization of machining parameters in micro milling of alumina ceramics using Nd:YAG laser. Measurement 95:181-192
28. Li C, Xiao Q, Tang Y et al (2016) A method integrating Taguchi, RSM and MOPSO to CNC machining parameters optimization for energy saving. J Clean Prod 135:263-275
29. Yi Q, Li C, Tang Y et al (2015) Multi-objective parameter optimization of CNC machining for low carbon manufacturing. J Clean Prod 95:256-264
30. Cao WD, Yan CP, Ding L et al (2016) A continuous optimization decision making of process parameters in high-speed gear hobbing using IBPNN/DE algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 85:2657-2667
31. Ni H, Yan C, Cao W et al (2020) A novel parameter decision approach in hobbing process for minimizing carbon footprint and processing time. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 111:3405-3419
32. Taylor FW (1906) On the art of cutting metals. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York
33. Mirjalili S, Jangir P, Mirjalili SZ et al (2017) Optimization of problems with multiple objectives using the multi-verse optimization algorithm. Knowl Based Syst 134:50-71
34. Mirjalili S, Mirjalili SM, Hatamlou A (2016) Multi-verse optimizer:a nature-inspired algorithm for global optimization. Neural Comput Appl 27(2):495-513
35. Zhang Y, Cao H, Zhu L et al (2017) High-speed dry gear hob life prediction model and optimization method. China Mech Eng 28(21):2614-2620

[1]	Qing-Shan Gong, Hua Zhang, Zhi-Gang Jiang, Han Wang, Yan Wang, Xiao-Li Hu. Nonempirical hybrid multi-attribute decision-making method for design for remanufacturing[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2019, 7(4): 423-437.
[2]	Ramanuj Kumar, Ashok Kumar Sahoo, Purna Chandra Mishra, Rabin Kumar Das. Comparative study on machinability improvement in hard turning using coated and uncoated carbide inserts: part II modeling, multi-response optimization, tool life, and economic aspects[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2018, 6(2): 155-175.
[3]	S. S. Yang, N. Nasr, S. K. Ong, A. Y. C. Nee. A holistic decision support tool for remanufacturing: end-of-life (EOL) strategy planning[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2016, 4(3): 189-201.
[4]	Omar A. Mohamed, Syed H. Masood, Jahar L. Bhowmik. Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters: a review of current research and future prospects[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2015, 3(1): 42-53.

Multi-verse optimizer based parameters decision with considering tool life in dry hobbing process

Multi-verse optimizer based parameters decision with considering tool life in dry hobbing process

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 4

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价