Optimizing mechanical properties of HIPS fabricated with low-cost desktop 3D printers: investigating the impact of process parameters

doi:10.1007/s40436-023-00475-9

Advances in Manufacturing ›› 2024, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (2): 379-395.doi: 10.1007/s40436-023-00475-9

• • 上一篇

Optimizing mechanical properties of HIPS fabricated with low-cost desktop 3D printers: investigating the impact of process parameters

Jin-Ting Xu, Guang-Wei Zhang, Man-Man Chen

School of Automotive Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, People's Republic of China

收稿日期:2022-12-25 修回日期:2023-06-21 发布日期:2024-05-16
通讯作者: Jin-Ting Xu,E-mail:xujt@dlut.edu.cn E-mail:xujt@dlut.edu.cn
作者简介:Jin-Ting Xu is a professor of school of automotive engineering at Dalian University of Technology, China. He received the B.S. degree (2002) in chemical machinary, the M.S. degree (2005) in mechanical engineering from Dalian University of Technology, and the Ph.D. degree (2009) in mechanical engineering from Shenyang Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China. His research interests include geometric modeling and algorithms for CNC machining, CAD/CAM integration, and additive manufacturing;
Guang-Wei Zhang recevied the M.S. degree (2023) in mechanical engineering from Dalian University of Technology, China. His main research interest is additive manufacturing;
Man-Man Chen recevied the M.S. degree (2021) in vehicle engineering from Dalian University of Technology, China. Her main research interest is additive manufacturing.
基金资助:
This study was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant No.51975097) and the National Key Research and Development Project(Grant No.2020YFA0713702).

Optimizing mechanical properties of HIPS fabricated with low-cost desktop 3D printers: investigating the impact of process parameters

Jin-Ting Xu, Guang-Wei Zhang, Man-Man Chen

School of Automotive Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, People's Republic of China

Received:2022-12-25 Revised:2023-06-21 Published:2024-05-16
Contact: Jin-Ting Xu,E-mail:xujt@dlut.edu.cn E-mail:xujt@dlut.edu.cn
Supported by:
This study was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant No.51975097) and the National Key Research and Development Project(Grant No.2020YFA0713702).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： Recently, low-cost desktop three-dimensional (3D) printers, employing the fused deposition modeling (FDM) technique, have gained widespread popularity. However, most users cannot test the strength of printed parts, and little information is available about the mechanical properties of printed high-impact polystyrene (HIPS) parts using desktop 3D printers. In this study, the user-adjustable parameters of desktop 3D printers, such as crisscross raster orientation, layer thickness, and infill density, were tested. The experimental plans were designed using the BoxBehnken method, and tensile, 3-point bending, and compression tests were carried out to determine the mechanical responses of the printed HIPS. The prediction models of the process parameters were regressed to produce the optimal combination of process parameters. The experimental results showcase that the crisscross raster orientation has significant effects on the flexural and compression strengths, but not on the tensile strength. With an increase in the layer thickness, the tensile, flexural, and compression strengths first decreased and then increased, reaching their minimum values at approximately 0.16 mm layer thickness. In addition, they all increased with an increase of infill density. It was demonstrated that when the raster orientation, layer thickness, and infill density were 13.08°/-76.92°, 0.09 mm, and 80 %, respectively, the comprehensive mechanical properties of the printed HIPS were optimal. Our results can help end-users of desktop 3D printers understand the effects of process parameters on the mechanical properties, and offer practical suggestions for setting proper printing parameters for fabricating HIPS parts.

The full text can be downloaded at https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40436-023-00475-9

关键词: Desktop three-dimensional (3D) printers, Fused deposition modeling (FDM), High-impact polystyrene (HIPS), Process parameters

Abstract: Recently, low-cost desktop three-dimensional (3D) printers, employing the fused deposition modeling (FDM) technique, have gained widespread popularity. However, most users cannot test the strength of printed parts, and little information is available about the mechanical properties of printed high-impact polystyrene (HIPS) parts using desktop 3D printers. In this study, the user-adjustable parameters of desktop 3D printers, such as crisscross raster orientation, layer thickness, and infill density, were tested. The experimental plans were designed using the BoxBehnken method, and tensile, 3-point bending, and compression tests were carried out to determine the mechanical responses of the printed HIPS. The prediction models of the process parameters were regressed to produce the optimal combination of process parameters. The experimental results showcase that the crisscross raster orientation has significant effects on the flexural and compression strengths, but not on the tensile strength. With an increase in the layer thickness, the tensile, flexural, and compression strengths first decreased and then increased, reaching their minimum values at approximately 0.16 mm layer thickness. In addition, they all increased with an increase of infill density. It was demonstrated that when the raster orientation, layer thickness, and infill density were 13.08°/-76.92°, 0.09 mm, and 80 %, respectively, the comprehensive mechanical properties of the printed HIPS were optimal. Our results can help end-users of desktop 3D printers understand the effects of process parameters on the mechanical properties, and offer practical suggestions for setting proper printing parameters for fabricating HIPS parts.

The full text can be downloaded at https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40436-023-00475-9

Key words: Desktop three-dimensional (3D) printers, Fused deposition modeling (FDM), High-impact polystyrene (HIPS), Process parameters

Jin-Ting Xu, Guang-Wei Zhang, Man-Man Chen. Optimizing mechanical properties of HIPS fabricated with low-cost desktop 3D printers: investigating the impact of process parameters[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2024, 12(2): 379-395.

参考文献

1. Yadav DK, Rajeev S, Dev S (2020) Design and fabrication of ABS part by FDM for automobile application. Mater Today: Proc 26:2089–2093
2. Daneshmand S, Nadooshan AA, Aghanajafi C (2008) Evaluation of FDM rapid prototyping with ABSi material for airfoil design. Mater Sci Forum 594:249–254
3. Hao YL, Li SJ, Yang R (2016) Biomedical titanium alloys and their additive manufacturing. Rare Met 35:661–671
4. Khosravani MR, Sadeghian H, Ayatollahi MR et al (2023) On the pin-bearing strength of additively manufactured polymer parts. Polymers 15(7):1660. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15071660
5. Derossi A, Caporizzi R, Oral MO et al (2020) Analyzing the effects of 3D printing process per se on the microstructure and mechanical properties of cereal food products. Innov Food Sci Emerg 66:102531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2020.102531
6. Dizon JRC, Espera AH Jr, Chen Q et al (2018) Mechanical characterization of 3D-printed polymers. Addit Manuf 20:44–67
7. Build a reprap (2020) reprapwiki, http://reprap.org/wiki/Build_A_RepRap
8. Bowyer A (2014) 3D printing and humanity’s first imperfect replicator. 3D Print Addit Manuf 1(1):4–5
9. Pearce JM (2012) Building research equipment with free, opensource hardware. Science 337(6100):1303–1304
10. Kreiger M, Pearce JM (2013) Environmental life cycle analysis of distributed 3D printing and conventional manufacturing of polymer products. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 12(1):1511–1519
11. Durgun I, Ertan R (2014) Experimental investigation of FDM process for improvement of mechanical properties and production cost. Rapid Prototyping J 20(3):228–235
12. Ziemian S, Okwara M, Ziemian CW (2015) Tensile and fatigue behavior of layered acrylonitrile butadiene styrene. Rapid Prototyping J 21(3):270–278
13. Bellini A, Güçeri S (2003) Mechanical characterization of parts fabricated using fused deposition modeling. Rapid Prototyping J 9(4):252–264
14. Ahn SH, Montero M, Odell D et al (2002) Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS. Rapid Prototyping J 8(4):248–257
15. Durgashyam K, Reddy MI, Balakrishna A et al (2019) Experimental investigation on mechanical properties of petg material processed by fused deposition modeling method. Mater Today: Proc 18(6):2052–2059
16. Chacòn JM, Caminero MA, García-Plaza E et al (2017) Additive manufacturing of PLA structures using fused deposition modelling: effect of process parameters on mechanical properties and their optimal selection. Mater Des 124:143–157
17. Sood AK, Ohdar R, Mahapatra S et al (2010) Parametric appraisal of mechanical property of fused deposition modelling processed parts. Mater Des 31(1):287–295
18. Aghanajafi C, Daneshmand S, Nadooshan AA (2009) Influence of layer thickness on the design of rapid-prototyped models. J Aircraft 46(3):981–987
19. Daneshmand S, Aghanajafi C (2012) Description and modeling of the additive manufacturing technology for aerodynamic coefficients measurement. Stroj vestn-J Mech E 58(2):125–133
20. Daneshmand S, Aghanajafi C, Shahverdi H (2012) Investigation of rapid manufacturing technology with ABS material for wind tunnel models fabrication. J Polym Eng 32(8/9):575–584
21. Sood AK, Ohdar RK, Mahapatra SS (2012) Experimental investigation and empirical modelling of FDM process for compressive strength improvement. J Adv Res 3(1):81–90
22. Dawoud M, Taha I, Ebeid SJ (2016) Mechanical behavior of ABS: an experimental study using FDM and injection moulding techniques. J Manuf Process 21:39–45
23. Tanikella NG, Wittbrodt B, Pearce JM (2017) Tensile strength of commercial polymer materials for fused filament fabrication 3D printing. Addit Manuf 15:40–47
24. Tymrak BM, Kreiger M, Pearce JM (2014) Mechanical properties of components fabricated with open-source 3-D printers under realistic environmental conditions. Mater Des 58:242–246
25. Lanzotti A, Grasso M, Staiano G et al (2015) The impact of process parameters on mechanical properties of parts fabricated in PLA with an open-source 3D printer. Rapid Prototyping J 21(5):604–617
26. Li H, Wang T, Sun J et al (2018) The effect of process parameters in fused deposition modelling on bonding degree and mechanical properties. Rapid Prototyping J 24(1):80–92
27. Gokhare VG, Raut DN, Shinde DK (2017) A review paper on 3D-printing aspects and various processes used in the 3D-printing. Int J Eng Res Technol 6(6):953–958
28. Kumari PVK, Yarraguntla S, Sharmila M et al (2021) Application of box-behnken design for formulation parameters of eslicarbazepine tablets. Indian J Pharm Sci 83(3):575–583
29. Belwal T, Dhyani P, Bhatt ID (2016) Optimization extraction conditions for improving phenolic content and antioxidant activity in Berberis asiatica fruits using response surface methodology (RSM). Food Chem 207:115–124

[1]	Yan-Hua Bian, Gang Yu, Xin Zhao, Shao-Xia Li, Xiu-Li He, Chong-Xin Tian, Zhi-Yong Li. Exit morphology and mechanical property of FDM printed PLA: influence of hot melt extrusion process[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2023, 11(1): 56-74.
[2]	Ammar H. Elsheikh, S. Shanmugan, T. Muthuramalingam, Amrit Kumar Thakur, F. A. Essa, Ahmed Mohamed Mahmoud Ibrahim, Ahmed O. Mosleh. A comprehensive review on residual stresses in turning[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2022, 10(2): 287-312.
[3]	Heng-Xin Ni, Chun-Ping Yan, Shen-Fu Ni, Huan Shu, Yu Zhang. Multi-verse optimizer based parameters decision with considering tool life in dry hobbing process[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2021, 9(2): 216-234.
[4]	Omar Ahmed Mohamed, Syed Hasan Masood, Jahar Lal Bhowmik. Modeling, analysis, and optimization of dimensional accuracy of FDM-fabricated parts using defi nitive screening design and deep learning feedforward artifi cial neural network[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2021, 9(1): 115-129.
[5]	Mohd Nazri Ahmad, Mohammad Khalid Wahid, Nurul Ain Maidin, Mohd Hidayat Ab Rahman, Mohd Hairizal Osman, Izzati Fatin Alis@Elias. Mechanical characteristics of oil palm fiber reinforced thermoplastics as filament for fused deposition modeling (FDM)[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2020, 8(1): 72-81.
[6]	Saroj Kumar Padhi, S. S. Mahapatra, Rosalin Padhi, Harish Chandra Das. Performance analysis of a thick copper-electroplated FDM ABS plastic rapid tool EDM electrode[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2018, 6(4): 442-456.
[7]	Saroj Kumar Padhi, Ranjeet Kumar Sahu, S. S. Mahapatra, Harish Chandra Das, Anoop Kumar Sood, Brundaban Patro, A. K. Mondal. Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters using a fuzzy inference system coupled with Taguchi philosophy[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2017, 5(3): 231-242.
[8]	Omar A. Mohamed, Syed H. Masood, Jahar L. Bhowmik. Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters: a review of current research and future prospects[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2015, 3(1): 42-53.

Optimizing mechanical properties of HIPS fabricated with low-cost desktop 3D printers: investigating the impact of process parameters

Optimizing mechanical properties of HIPS fabricated with low-cost desktop 3D printers: investigating the impact of process parameters

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 8

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价