1. Donachie MJ Jr, ASM International (2000) Titanium: a technical guide, 2nd edn. Material Information Society, Materials Park,pp 79–842. Ezugwu EO, Wang ZM (1997) Titanium alloys and their machinability—a review. J Mater Process Technol 68(3):262–2743. Komanduri R, Von Turkovich BF (1981) New observations on the mechanism of chip formation when machining titanium alloys. Wear 69(2):179–1884. Hong HATJM, Riga AT, Gahoon JM, Scott CG (1993) Machinability of steels and titanium alloys under lubrication.Wear 162:34–395. Kramer BM, Hartung PD (1981) Theoretical considerations in the machining of nickel-based alloys. In: Cutting Tool Materials.ASM, Materials Park, Ohio, pp 57–746. Noordin MY, Venkatesh VC, Sharif S, Elting S, Abdullah A (2004) Application of response surface methodology in describing the performance of coated carbide tools when turning AISI 1045 steel. J Mater Process Technol 145(1):46–587. Montgomery DC (1997) Design and analysis of experiments, 4th edn. Wiley, New York8. Thiele JD, Melkote S (1999) Effect of cutting edge geometry and workpiece hardness on surface generation in the finish hard turning of AISI 52100 steel. J Mater Process Technol 94(2):216–2269. Nes¸eli S, Yald?z S, Tu¨rkes¸ E (2011) Optimization of tool geometry parameters for turning operations based on the response surface methodology. Measurement 44(3):580–58710. Masounave J, Youssef YA, Beauchamp Y, Thomas M (1997) An experimental design for surface roughness and built-up edge formation in lathe dry turning. Int J Qual Sci 2(3):167–18011. Makadia AJ, Nanavati JI (2013) Optimization of machining parameters for turning operations based on response surface methodology. Measurement 46(6):1521–152912. Choudhury IA, El-Baradie MA (1997) Surface roughness prediction in the turning of high-strength steel by factorial design of experiments. J Mater Process Technol 67(1):55–6113. Fnides B, Yallese MA, Mabrouki T, Rigal JF (2011) Application of response surface methodology for determining cutting force model in turning hardened AISI H11 hot work tool steel. Sadhana 36(1):109–12314. Saini S, Ahuja IS, Sharma VS (2012) Influence of cutting parameters on tool wear and surface roughness in hard turning of AISI H11 tool steel using ceramic tools. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 13(8):1295–130215. Mandal N, Doloi B, Mondal B (2012) Force prediction model of zirconia toughened alumina (ZTA) inserts in hard turning of AISI 4340 steel using response surface methodology. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 13(9):1589–159916. Tsourveloudis NC (2010) Predictive modelling of the Ti6Al4V alloy surface roughness. J Intell Robot Syst 60(3–4):513–53017. Ramesh S, Karunamoorthy L, Palanikumar K (2008) Surface roughness analysis in machining of titanium alloy. Mater Manuf Process 23(2):174–18118. Makadia AJ, Nanavati JI (2013) Optimization of machining parameters for turning operations based on response surface methodology. Measurement 46(1):1521–1529 |